[ad_1]
Last week, when Google announced that the Pixel 3a and the Pixel 3a XL would include the headphone jack, I almost pulled my hamstring jumping for joy. Although the news is always good, the official reasoning of Google is doubtful. Soniya Jobanputra, product manager at Google I / O 2019, said, "We really felt that consumers at this price level and at this level really needed flexibility. [for the headphone jack]. This insinuates that only those with limited funds want a headphone jack.
On a superficial level, its logic makes sense. After all, the Venn Diagram showing people who consider low-cost phones and those who buy cheap wired headsets – rather than expensive wireless headphones – probably contains a lot of overlap. This is where the logic goes.
Even if a consumer can afford wireless headphones, do not give up the desire to choose. Assuming that this benefits Google in the immediate future, since Pixel users are more likely to buy than the Pixel Buds buttons or the proprietary dongle. In the end, consumers will flock to flagship products presenting more, not less. All this debacle is stupid given the fact that the headphone jack was an industry before Apple removed it.
Affordability aside, it has been said ad nauseum how wired audio outperforms wireless audio. Audiophiles spend the most on headphones and are willing to pay extra for what is billed as a budget function. The dongles may seem like an acceptable alternative, but it is not. They eliminate the possibility of charging a phone while listening to music and introduce a host of compatibility issues on Android devices.
Being able to buy more expensive audio accessories does not give up the desire to choose.
While it's nice to see Google bring back the headphone jack to low-budget consumers, Jobanputra's statement is worrisome. The wording "… at this level …" refers to the real possibility that Pixel 4 publishes the jack-less. That will only extend the whiplash of the headphone jack we've had in the last two years.
[ad_2]
Source link