GOP represses Democratic Senate acting as good people



[ad_1]

Republican Senator Ben Sasse of Nebraska was absolutely right today to say that some of his fellow Democrats play "gangster politics" with the Supreme Court.

Sasse's comment was made while he was associated with the delivery of a well-worded letter to the Clerk of the Supreme Court from the 53 Republican Senators, urging the court not to be intimidated by the threats slightly veiled policies by five Democratic senators. In an official memoir of a court friend on a pending gun control case, these five people had written the following:

"The Supreme Court is not doing well. And people know it. Perhaps the Court can heal itself before the public demands that it be "restructured to reduce the influence of politics". Especially on the urgent issue of gun control, a nation desperately needs to heal. "

As Republican senators have aptly described, "The implication is clear as of the day: dismiss this case, or we will pack the court". In other words, the same Democrats who have tried for years to politicize the courts now threaten the political authorities. retribution because they momentarily lose the battle.

What the Democrats are threatening to do is to "squeeze" the Supreme Court by increasing its size from nine judges to 13 or 15 if a Democrat takes the White House. It is not just a hard policy, but an abuse of total power. Franklin Roosevelt was last proposed in 1937 by a president. The reaction of the public against him was fierce.

Despite a landslide victory in the reelection, 523 votes out of 8, Roosevelt could not convince Congress to pack his bags. By 70 votes to 20, the Senate rejected the proposal, and in 1938, Roosevelt's Democratic Party suffered a major reaction, losing 72 seats in the House and seven in the Senate.

Yet today's Democrats want to pick up Roosevelt's terrible idea. As Republican senators have written, this means that "the independence of justice is being attacked … It's one thing for politicians to peddle these ideas in tweets or on the stub. But the democrats' amicus brief shows that their plans to triumph in court are not limited to mere pimping. They pose a direct and immediate threat to the independence of the judiciary and the rights of all Americans. "

Or, as Sasse says, "it's gangster politics".

The five Senate Democratic leaders should reprimand them. Even the vigorous liberal justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg has argued against court-ordered litigation, strongly claiming that "nine seems to be a good number" for the court's duties. If the Democrats want to implement their policies, they must try to win honest elections instead of abusing power. Don Corleone does not belong in either the Senate or the Supreme Court.

[ad_2]

Source link