[ad_1]
His. Thom tillisThomas (Thom) Roland Tillis 17 Republicans who voted to advance Senate infrastructure bill Senate votes for GOP infrastructure deal, Democrats fight over masks in House, Senate MORE (RN.C.) credits the Democratic senator. Kyrsten Cinema (Arizona) by pushing a bipartisan infrastructure spending program to the finish line this week.
“It’s rare that an elected official from one party publicly praises another from the opposite party, but that’s exactly what I do because it’s so essential to the future of our nation that Sinema is committed to keeping the obstruction intact, “Tillis wrote in an NBC News op-ed on Wednesday. “If Democrats had cleared the filibuster, there would have been no attempt to find common ground on infrastructure or other critical issues. That doesn’t necessarily make the legislation easier, but it brings members of the two parties in the same room working together for the good of the nation, as our founding fathers understood it. ”
Ahead of a Senate voting rights showdown last month, Sinema announced his support for legislative obstruction, a hurdle Democrats have said is hampering meaningful progress on a host of issues facing the country.
“Systematic obstruction forces moderation and helps protect the country from wild fluctuations between opposing political poles,” she said at the time. “It is time for the Senate to debate the legislative obstruction, so that senators and our constituents can fully hear and consider the concerns and consequences.” Hopefully senators can then focus on policy making through open legislative processes and amendments, finding compromises that garner broad support. . ”
On Wednesday evening, the Senate voted in favor of a bipartisan infrastructure package after months of debate and negotiations with the White House. Seventeen Republicans joined the 50 Democrats in supporting a motion to vote on the package.
“We are very happy to reach a deal,” Sinema told reporters after the vote. “I just want to say that everyone has been amazing doing this job for so many months.”
Maintaining that precedent is a good thing, Tillis wrote in his editorial.
[ad_2]
Source link