AEK – Articles – Nikolas Aktypis – Articles – A.E.K. is ultimately self-destructive



[ad_1]

In general, during the trip from the year of his downgrading to the practical confirmation of this "We come", which has become the slogan of the AEK Renaissance, the Union has created more than sympathies that dislike the non fanatics of the region.

This finding obviously excludes the elements of the movement of organized partisans who are indifferent (at least) to any development involving a group other than the one they like and whom they perceive as belonging to them.

Nicolas Actypis writes

Last year, AEK reached its first championship in 24 years. She was a beautiful champion. Not always. Often, the glbades do not allow you to see the team that goes through the score of your heart. For the majority of fans, however, the Union did so in a fair and clear manner. The opposite view of PAOK (included to some extent) was not enough to reverse this scale, which remained firmly opposed to it.

What happened from that moment is difficult to interpret.

The Union has shown a weakness that others may have characterized by an inability to manage its success, which has worsened with the entry of the team into the clubs of the Champions League. Championship and Europe at the highest level possible. A double blessing that ends up degenerating into disaster, without being able to understand how and why.

The body called AEK began to show worrying signs when (for some reason) it did not keep up with the ranks of the head coach and his big protagonists on the pitch. When the administration claimed to "keep someone who loves", but in practice, it has lost in quality and (as it turned out) irreplaceable footballers.

He continued not to get back on his feet when he went on the transcription bar in very different streets from those in which he had imagined his world or the … plateau. In the constant expressions of dissatisfaction or even questioning of work, the permanent answer was that there was a plan and enough time to implement it, until it came to an end. it turns out that this was not the case, but nothing could be corrected.

And in the same season, which started at a completely different starting point than a champion's comparative advantage, the same treatment was applied to voices that said something was wrong with the club. Waiting for unsuccessful results, then the spasmodic response to the crisis to show that they were right to those who shouted and not to those who criticized them by pointing fingers at them.

AEK decided to do this in the case of players who do not renew their contracts, giving them the media and the fans of the North. His rights as a club. And the right of professional footballers to manage themselves as they wish. Whether there were isolated incidents or unprecedented, we would talk about another story. However, the very immediate past shows that the majority of AEK players whose contracts are completed choose not to renew their contract. It can not, it shows something …

For the end the fan is left. The one who fell on the streets last May seeing a dream come true. Whoever is eager to buy a sustainable ticket. Whoever looks daily at the work in "Aya-Sophia". Whoever is responsible for the penalty of withdrawal of three points from the championship. The one who co-wrote the announcement of the most dynamic supporter of the Yellow-Blacks who said "no excuses, only acts". Whoever participated in the episodes that undermine the future of the team. Obviously, "he" and "he" – and every "he" is not the same person.

The common element is feelings about the "queen". The different is the behavior and the way of their expression. Some of these "ones" have managed to complete the self-destruct image of this club, adding another problem to a group that has failed to handle the previous ones. Do not make him more sympathetic to the neutrals who drank their jealousy for his achievements in the respect of what he did.

[ad_2]
Source link