Criticism of Panathinaikos players – Panathinaikos

DIOUDIS: Socrates Dououdis recommenced as first player in the first 45 minutes and is not responsible for the two goals that Panathinaikos accepted in the period he fought. From then on, he had two easy interventions, and he walked the ball properly when he needed it.

GIECHNSON: The Swedish defender and Bouzouki fought the longest. In the first 45 minutes, he played as a shot straight and with the start of the second part as a right back boss instead of Koolimbali. In the first part is accused a very serious mistake that brought the second goal of Den Haag as in an easy phase could not get rid of the ball. From that moment, he had no more bad moments. In the 25th minute of the second, unlike Kulibali, he was unable to run errands and help the attack being quite tired.

KOLOVETSIOS: Again he started the game as the main goal post, having Johansson on his right and left Mavromati. He is absent from both phases of goals because he ended up covering his role as a libero while he was injured in the 35th of the match and as a result he was influenced and changed to 41 & # 39; by the Dion.

MAYROMATIS: The young defender with his presence in the preparation managed to get enough points and that's why the Dow made him a major opponent against Den Haag. The two Dutch goals came from his side but he was not solely responsible for himself since the defensive operation of the greens in general was poor in both phases. The 21-year-old defector tried to answer his role by giving duels to Dutch attackers.

KOULIBALI: The defensive player from Mali played as a back boss and in the first half he played on the right side of Panathinaikos. From there, most of the attacks came, the pressure came, the bullets and it was threatening. In his defensive duties, he quickly closed his camp and left no breach to the far right.

HATZITHEODORIDIS: Despite the fact that he has a few days at Panathinaikos, his 21-year-old player does not face a problem of adjustment and improves better and better. In the match with Den Haag, he took many aggressive initiatives and scored a nice goal. Maybe he was a little on the defensive because he should have a better cooperation with Mavromatis and get closer a little faster on the right side.

STAIKOS: The 22-year-old midfielder started in the original form, having this time with Kace next to him and a little more inhibitor. Unlike the previous two friendlies, he did not take the ball on his feet. As many times as he was a recipient, he certainly played and made no mistake in helping enough to develop Panathinaikos. He misses the first Dutch goal as Kace.

KATSE: He started the game and was the average who tried to put a ball on his feet to play and help the aggressive development of the green while also having the spirit in defense. The Albanian midfielder has had some good transfers and good breaks showing enough humor. He is also responsible for the Equalization of Den Haag, just like Staikos.

BOUZOUKIS: The best of Panathinaikos in friendly with the Dutch. Buzu asked for balls, tried and tried to threaten all the time that he fought, with Johansson they were the players with the greatest participation time. The young footballer was very active, changing his team game and whenever he found an empty space, he was trying to threaten with shots but they could not find a target. In the second part and over time, he seemed tired too.

HATZIGIOVANIS: Another 21-year-old striker who entered the show and tried to make good phases with Hatzhiotheodoridis on the left side of the Panathinaikos attack. Sometimes he was distributing the ball correctly, while in others, he was delaying it a bit more, which was a waste of the positive energy that he had done before. He was also replaced at half-time.

REKKOS: A third match for Regako who once again played as a play center and could not find nets. But he could not find him because he was not fed up enough. In the first 45 minutes he played, he was in the mood, he chased the phases and from him, he started the goal of Panathinaikos. However, he stayed away from the aggressive play of Panathinaikos.

THEOCHARIS: He came to 41 "instead of Koloveziou injured and played as central defender. He tried as much as he could but in the second part the Panathinaikos lines had big gaps, so the Dutch attacked three more against three and the green defense was exposed. He had a good time in second place to score with his head in the first bar but he did not put his head up.

KOTSARIS: He moved to second place under the posts instead of Dououdis. mistakes he had made against Antwerp and had some bad estimates. But then, over time, he found his choices and had two pretty good reactions and a rescue of the Dutch.

OIKONOMOPOULOS: The young defender came in as a good goal in the first 45 minutes, when Panathinaikos' defense was more vulnerable. This resulted in eating two balls on the back from which Den Haag became threatening without scoring however. Offensive Oikonomopoulos tried to avoid mistakes and simply play the ball avoiding big balls and giving the ball.

OIKONOMOU: He went to second place in the place of Mavromatis, played on the left rear and tried to defeat his position as the most experienced of the three who were fighting at the time. time in the showdown. The left-handed defender has been positive in most of the action he's led in the match, and in the third goal he's not responsible as Den Haag comes out with three in the game. # 39; attack.

INSUA: He overcame his injury in a short time and started playing as a left boss. He showed frivolity in several phases while he could not help defensively but also aggressively Panathinaikos. Argentina took a nervous break while he kept chewing at a stage that was not necessary but again he wanted to defend young Panathinaikos players.

TZANDARIS: He went in front of Staikos in the match and had a positive performance in the 45 minutes that he disputed as he was active in defense and attack. He avoided mistakes in the defense, handed the ball straight while aggressively threatening Den Haag's defense on two scoring opportunities. But he did not succeed.

FACT: At the beginning of the second part, he went to Katsis' place in the showdown for a role he wanted to create for his team. He had mood and appetite and tried to help the green but without success. Sometimes he held more than he owed, while his own mistake was the third goal that Panathinaikos received. He misses the ball in the middle, in an easy mistake, does not turn to cover, and Den Haag just gets out in the transceiver and ends the scene.

MOUNTAIN: The French came in with an appetite in the game and tried to help Panathinaikos aggressively become threatening. He did not do it in the first half hour, he touched the knee in 75 'and was forced to leave the Panathinaikos with ten players.

After his good presence in friendly GOES, he took the opportunity to play 45 minutes against a stronger opponent. He came to Regakus' place and in general made his presence felt. He had a good time putting his head to send the ball to the net. From then on, he tried with his pbades to create opportunities for his teammates and showed that he was contralateral. But we must also strengthen.

APOSTOLAKIS: He came to 70- instead of Johansson and again showed the militantism that distinguishes him by entering the thousand in several phases. He tried as a defender to be positive in defense and attack, but did not take much action on his feet.

EMMANOUILIDIS: The Panathinaikos striker also went to the 70th game in front of Bouzouki and the clover that he fought became threatening. He had two attempts to score but he did not score. He tried to help the greens in the time that he played.