[ad_1]
Houthesiotis: In the first two goals, they were "executed" with a clear shot, resulting from his defensive behavior. Both penalties fell correctly, the second found the ball but could not change course. She had 2-3 good interventions, but two misplaced outings. He has the slightest responsibility for this 4-0
Elambdelaui: He seemed to have heavy legs, was unable to watch his opponents in "one against one" and much more to provide quick coverage in the sites, while that no has found a way to contribute to the creative / aggressive part of the game.
Cishe: With Vukovic, they are responsible for the first goal of Genk. In Samata's sentence, the energy of Senegal can only be described as unpredictable. Typical three cases that made "tsif" in the easy arguments of the ball. The poor day 22-year-old
Vukovic: He earned points every day in preparation, lost a lot of them from his presence against Genk. He was unable to cooperate in an easy phase with Cissé, allowing Troyes to easily score 1-0. Totally false was the cover that he went to give Tsimika to 4-0. He also lost phases in the air.
Tsimikas: His biggest problem was that he seemed to lack strength and jargon with his opponents. At least he has selfishly and taken aggressive initiatives. Of his own individual power and pbades to Postense, Olympiacos missed his chance at the match with Guerrero in 48 "
Buhakalakis: His skier does not help him anyway against fast opponents. the heavy legs of preparation aggravated the problem against the Belgians. He can not push the ball effectively, he has not managed to cover the gaps and has often seen his opponents leave him on their backs.
Kamaras: When the match goes through the feet of Olympiakos, the 21-year-old midfielder has no problem, being extremely comfortable when he controls the ball. Against Genk, he struggled with the fast pace of the Belgian and the game without ball, with good returns but bad investments.
Fortune: Low flying for the Olympiakos playmaker, who in any case did not have the support of the players on his back and who, inevitably, did not found no cooperation on the axle. He was found with Christodoulopoulos, less with Guerrero, not with Fetafatzidis. He did not have the tension and the right decisions.
Fetzatzidis: Unprepared winger of 28 years, could not keep pace with his opponents, nor torture them to power.
Christodoulopoulos: The easy shot that he made in the 7th did not cost Olympiakos, since the right hand of Houtsaiostis did his job. He took initiatives, made two good out-of-area efforts, found collaborations with Fortune and helped Omar. He managed to keep his head above the water
Guerrero: The Spaniard had been fighting for a while, but in a bad day for his team he could not do much. thing. Kinetic, he offered props, came to the side, sought collaborations but no effect. In the 48's, in the only case he was fed properly, he could not beat the opponent.
Pope: Good contact with the ball, a craftsman, knows when to give a width to the attack and when to cut the handle. It still takes a few days to reach 100% because it's a little time with the team. He was pissed off in two or three cases that his teammates did not feed him in time. In turn, the missed opportunity of Guerrero came to 48 "
Androutsos: His speed, combined with the tension that he puts in his game, gave a breath to the axle but up there. He does not "buckle" with Buchalakis, while he remains aggressively aggressive
* Koutris, Hatzisafi and Ansarifard entered the match in the 80's with the score already at 4-0
Photo credits: eurokinissi
[ad_2]
Source link
