[ad_1]
Google intends to appeal the decision of the European Commission imposing a fine of 4.34 billion euros to the online giant.
The Commission blames Google for illegal practices in the Android operating system that violate the antitrust rules of the EU.
"Android has created more choice for everyone, no less." The flourishing ecosystem, innovation and price reduction are the clbadic characteristics of strong competition, "said a spokesman for the company.
According to Google, the decision ignores the fact that Android mobile competitor competes with iOS.
"It also neglects the number of options that Android offers to thousands of mobile phone manufacturers and mobile operators who manufacture and sell Android devices to millions of developers worldwide. applications in the world that have developed their business with Android ". l & # 39; company.
The whole answer of Google
"Android has created more choices, not less
]
If you buy an Android phone, you choose one of the two platforms the world's most popular mobiles – the one that's best developed in the mobile phone options available around the world
Today, the European Commission has made the decision to violate the competition of the system Android operating and its business model
The decision ignores the fact that Android mobile phones compete with the mobile iOS, 89% of respondents said in a market study by the European Commission itself
Also does not take into account the number of options that Android offers to the thousands of mobile phone manufacturers and mobile operators that manufacture and sell Android devices to millions of developers worldwide. # 39; a worldwide applications that have created their business with Android and billions of consumers who now has the opportunity to buy and use the latest Android smartphones
Today, thanks to Android, it There are more than 24,000 devices in more than 1,300 different product brands, including Dutch, Finnish, French, German, Latvian, Polish, Romanian, Spanish and Swedish manufacturers.
The phones manufactured by these companies are all different but have a common feature – the ability to use the same applications. This is made possible by the simple rules that ensure technical compatibility, regardless of the size or shape of the device.
No phone manufacturer is required to sign these rules – he can use or modify the Android operating system as he wishes, such as companies like Amazon with Fire tablets and TV keys [19659002] To have successful open source platforms, we must carefully weigh the needs of everyone who uses them. The story, however, shows that without basic compatibility rules, open source platforms are broken down, which affects users, developers, and phone manufacturers. Android compatibility rules avoid this and help Android to propose a long-term proposition for everyone
Today, thanks to Android, a standard phone can have pre-installed around 40 different developer applications, not just the company from which the phone was purchased
If you prefer other applications – or browsers or search engines – instead of being pre- installed, you can easily disable or delete them and choose other applications, including those created by some of the 1.6 million Europeans who are professionally active as application developers.
In fact, a typical Android phone user will install about 50 apps on his own
Last year, more than 94 billion apps were downloaded worldwide from our Play store? Navigation programs such as Opera Mini and Firefox have been downloaded more than 100 million times and the UC browser more than 500 million times
This is totally opposed to the way things were going in the years 1990 and early 2000 at the time of numbering. Then the change of applications pre-installed on your computer or the addition of new applications has been technically difficult and tedious. The Commission 's decision on Android overlooks the current range of choices and clear numbers on how consumers are using their phones today
In 2007, we chose to offer Android free of charge to phone manufacturers and mobile operators. Of course, there are different costs involved in building Android and Google has invested billions of dollars in the last decade to make Android what it is today.
This investment makes sense for us because we can offer phone manufacturers the ability to pre-install a number of popular Google applications (such as Search, Chrome, Play, Maps and Gmail), some of which, they generate revenue for us from advertisements while they all ensure that the device will work as soon as it comes out of its box
Phone manufacturers are not required to include our services and are also free to pre-install competing applications to ours. This means that we only have revenue if our applications are installed and if users choose to use our own applications instead of competing.
Free distribution of the Android platform and the Google application series is not only effective for manufacturers phones and suppliers, but also for developers and consumers. If the phone manufacturers and mobile operators could not include our applications on a wide range of devices, it would create confusion for the balance of the Android ecosystem.
Up to now, the Android business model meant that we will have to charge our technology to mobile manufacturers or rely on a strictly controlled distribution model
We have always agreed that the size also creates the corresponding responsibilities. A healthy and prosperous Android ecosystem is in the interest of all and we have shown that we are ready to make changes
But it is worrisome that today 's decision is disrupting the future. balance that we reached with the Android operating system and sends a worrying message in favor of proprietary systems compared to open platforms
Innovation, range of choice and price reduction are clbadic features of strong competition, and Android is all about it. Today 's decision welcomes the Android operating system while rejecting the business model that supports it
Today' s decision rejects the model Business that supports Android, which has created more choices for everyone, no less. We plan to appeal. "
[ad_2]
Source link
