In an emergency race, Polish judges with the nationalist government for the control of justice



[ad_1]

Supreme Court judges are ready for controversy with the country's right-wing government over controversial reform of their early retirement

Demonstrations are already planned for them today and tomorrow in front of Supreme Court offices in Warsaw, while the Commission has also rushed to her, who yesterday decided to initiate a lawsuit against Poland on the "unconstitutional", as the critics call it , the reform

The European Commission says that the law that came into force last April and that states that senior Polish magistrates will have to retire from 65 years instead of 70, which was in force until 39. at present, will undermine the independence of the judiciary [19659004] The settlement affects one third of the best judges in the country. Anyone wishing to maintain his position despite exceeding the age limit of 65 will have to apply to the Polish President, Andrew Duntuna, accompanied by a medical certificate stating that he is in good health [19659004]. but she "intends to remain in office until 30 April 2020, as provided for by the Polish Constitution" a representative of the Court of Justice

Thursday last, p his brothers and sisters supported Gersdorf in his decision, pointing out that the judges who took office before the entry into force of the new reform "must remain at their posts until the end of the year. Age 70, without additional conditions. "

Announcing the legal measures against Poland, Commission spokesman Margaritis Schinas said yesterday that immediate action is necessary "to prevent a irreparable harm to the independence of the Supreme Court. "

the margin of a month for n But the nationalist government party PiS is determined to continue implementing its plans for profound changes of the Polish judicial system, which he considers as " necessary "to fight against corruption.

An argument-pretext, according to the opinion of Gersdorf. [19459109] "All these modifications are not intended to safeguard the public interest, but only to replace the judges",

[ad_2]
Source link