[ad_1]
The voice of the MP from the Democratic Republic of Macedonia has been raised Voridis and the Deputy Speaker of the House of Parliament Christodoulopoulou.
Mr Makis Voridis provoked reactions from deputies of SYRIZA when he declared that Communism had collapsed by his side SYRIZA wants revenge now to abolish the religious and ethnic identity of the Greeks therefore wishes the separation of a church-state and increases his speech – by addressing the members of SYRIZA – saying that he is "ethnologists. The crucified can not be in the courts or in the schools. Do not hide the truth. Tell people that if they continue to celebrate religious holidays, it will be because that is the custom. This directly affects the religious identity of the Greeks ".
The Deputy Speaker of the House, Tbadia Christodoulopoulou, responded to the New Democracy MP by calling him "theoretician of the far right in the country, which is of course a minority in the southwestern part of the country and is not related to Golden Dawn Golden Dawn. But you have to formalize it to see what you are going to do. "Referring to the Tsipra-Ieronymou agreement, Ms. Tasia Christodoulopoulou added that" SYRIZA is indifferent to the political cost when it considers that there are mature issues to debate and legislate, we did it with the agreement of Prespa, so we do it now ".
Macedonian MP Makis Voridis responded to Ms Tasia Christodoulopoulou by launching a new offensive stating that "According to SYRIZA, whoever defends national and religious identity is a far-right. I leave the judgment. "
Assault of Georgiadis in Christodoulopoulou
A little later, a new accusation was presented in the House when ND Adonis Georgiadis, the Vice-President, commented on the views expressed by the President of the House, Tbadia Christodoulopoulou, on human rights: hypocrites. Personally, you. I did not see you respect the rights of minorities in the House when we asked the Committee of Institutions call Mr. Kammenos and you denied him " while I was even more melodious saying: Tsipras gone and released pigeon at their party theophany, did he do it because he was obliged by the Constitution? No. Has he done it because he is a religious man? No, he said he was an atheist. He did it because he went to get votes. He went there because he realized that such is the will of the people. "
The Vice President of New Democracy spoke to Vatopedi and Mount Athos, saying that "here we were looking at Vatopedi, it was not SYRIZA who then accused Karamanlis. The agreement Tsipra – Archbishop is Vatopedi for a thousand. So when you do the major with the problems of the Church, you will do the minor. "Georgiades also said that" he can not separate the state from the Church, we are one thing, it is the participation in your orthodox faith that you do not " do not like … the vast majority of citizens are Orthodox Christians and we have this identity so we do not want to harm Article 3 of the Constitution and, because we are much more than the people themselves do not will not let you hurt Article 3, you will stay true to your fantasies. "
Venizelos: Political transaction agreement Tsipra – Ieronymos
The discussion on the revision of Article 3 has given rise to another frontal conflict in the House with the former PASOK President. Evangelos Venizelos designate "political transaction " sure agreement between him Prime Minister and his Archbishop "In exchange for the lack of objection on the part of the Church to amend Article 3 of the Constitution".
He talked about cheating she public opinion with that will empty 10,000 public places the employees the priests declared that they were not bound by public law to their institution, otherwise they would retire with a political pension. Therefore, he added "coal to the treasure and this colossal bubble is already broken ".
Evangelos Venizelos recalled that he had proposed the complete separation of something that the Church did not accept and how a solution for the next revision would be to include an interpretative declaration under the law. Article 3, which would simply state that Article 3 does not establish a derogation from freedom of religion and Article 13.
And this solution gave as if the term "dominant" religion, even with the Council of Europe in science, was descriptive. It is the conclusion that the vast majority of people belong to the Eastern Orthodox Church. The term "prevailing" can not establish restrictions on freedom of religion or deviations from Article 13
[ad_2]
Source link
