[ad_1]
The complete text on which the decision of MESY was founded
"Potami was founded as a political movement for justice, work , education Its aim was and remains to fight for a productive and prosperous Greece Greece 19659003 Fought and fought for an open society, without a client state, without great inequalities, with a strong rule of law and an economy oriented towards Outside
In his four-year political course, the river over them authorities moved, he was confronted with populism and conservatism.He received tons of mud from SYRIZANEL and suffered multi-faceted attacks. , but he endured and brought new values to the political life.
He followed the difficult road ignoring the political cost.He never claimed the monopoly of the truth.With errors, with weak its, with problems, with departures of members but without a deviant moment of its principles.
Still he tried to meet other forces. He believes and believes that more forces are needed to promote the truly progressive changes the country needs. For the defeat of populism and conservatism
The 2nd Potami Conference decided to establish the Parliament of the Center. We co-created the Dialogue Committee on Progressive Reforms with Democratic Compatriosis and Other Space Forces in 2016.
Last summer, the MESSA approved the decision to coexist with "Compatriation democratic "of a new Progressive Movement, all the forces of the region and will have open doors to those who do not participate in any existing regimes but who would like to join the effort for Greece in the 21st century [19659003] 212,000 citizens supported the polls the adventure. Unfortunately, continuity has not met their expectations. The movement of movement, a system involving all parties and the centro-center-left movement, is revealed different from what we started. It was spent on internal balances, it avoided opening to people outside the narrow walls of the party, the most critical decisions are taken from a tight circle around the president and not after a dialogue in the political bodies
Errors and failures in the structure of the Movement left the field free for functional distortions and for political behaviors that undermined the democratic functioning and the unity of the space and led with certainty to the current crisis
Potami tried to promote the positions and always defended its principles. Different points of view, instead of being considered wealth, are now considered a burden. Unity should have as a necessary and inalienable respect the pluralism and long-standing positions of the political forces that make up the Movement for Change on the country's major issues. The requirement of monolithicity is incompatible with an open and democratic movement of values and progress
Coexistence in the same party made it clear, consistently and in all respects that it was also a problem for the party PASOK who only wanted to hear his own voice as the greatest power of space.
Potami members have a hypocritical mind, but they are not ready to sacrifice their opinions on the balance of the altar, nor to shut up. They will continue to defend them following the course they have traced since the foundation of the river
So we decide today to disconnect the river from the movement of change
Our disconnection is not an easy decision for the river. We were co-founders of the movement of change. Everyone knows that the Movement of Change would not have existed without the participation of the River, as well as the participation of PASOK, CIDISO, DIMAR, Reformers, Movements of Citizens and other forces. progressives
. the members and executives of Potamio appealed to this meeting with the sincere wish to overcome any reservations that might have existed on either side
The Elementary Defense of Good Competition Relations between the Forces of the Movement of change, of which we have consensus on many issues and avoidance of widening the distance between us, now requires Potami to make this decision.
The political spaces with which we met in the formation of the Movement of Change are still linked The river with these forces to promote the great changes and reforms that the Greek society needs is to continue where our points of view coincide.
The Great Meeting of the River Deputies makes the decision today about the world who believed in the need for a truly new Movement and saw its hopes of being falsified
. this base, he announces a conference in autumn
He will also continue to defend his founding values and on this road, he will meet all who believe that "we must change everything without destroying the country".
Telephone Theodorakis-Gennimatas
Theodorakis Street, according to information, contacted Mr. Gennimatas Sunday morning, in which she specified that the divorce must be consensual and that it will not give the tone of the confrontation with KINAL. According to the same sources, Master Gennimata's treatment was cold.
Shortly before the vote
In his last speech, Stavros Theodorakis made it clear that he had not cooperated with SYRIZANEL in response to certain executive reports for the next day that were bothering him.
According to the information he said: "We all know here.It is unreasonable to say that we will replace ANEL in the SYRIZA government."
Kykrou-Meimaroglou's Proposal
On the Eve Potamos at KINAL under the conditions suggested at the meeting by MP Miltiadis Kyrkos and Yiannis Meimaroglou.
The terms refer to basic reforms with a precise timetable for the process of their implementation
If this is not accepted by KINAL within 15 days, we leave and organize the conference of Potamos for the development of these positions. 9003] Speech St. Theodorakis at MESY
According to the same information, he stated that his initial goal of expanding forces in the movement of change has not been achieved and therefore considers that the one solution for the moment is to divide the streets with the movement of change.
The leader of the river, announced a party conference since September to decide his new autonomous way while denying the scenarios that he reached an agreement (19459008)
Their subsequent movements after departure of Potamia of the Movement of Change, with the ND, or with SYRIZA.
Conservative Tour invokes chief Potamio the bad divorce necessary argues in Charilaos Trikoupis [quidevraitêtreofficiellementannoncéaujourd'huisontprévusparPhofiGennimatasetStavrosTheodorakisLatentativedecoexistertouteslesforcesduCentreetduCentre-GauchedansunenouvelleentiténepouvaitmêmepasêtrecomptéedanslessondagesLadynamiquedonnéeparles212000personnesquiontparticipéauprocessusd'électionduleaderetaupremierscrutinàdeuxchiffresaéclatécommeondit"danslesmauvaischoixdanslesremisesaupartiuniquedunouveaupartidanslapersistancedesancienséquilibresdansunnouveaujoueuretstratégiespersonnelles"s'estfinalementmanifestécomme"incompatibilitédecaractères"
Stavros Theodorakis attend the panhellenic concentration of the leaders of Potamos, whose latest polls are his weapon.He would have been focused on the intense confrontation he had had with Fofi Gennimata at the last meeting of the Political Council Mr. Theodorakis criticized Gennimatas' decision to call elections here and now, but also his position on Macedonian, observing that these are choices that will lead to a democratic retreat for the Movement for Change, because they deprive him of 39, a critical public placed in the center of the Center. . The Potamia leader feels justified because he thinks that Gennimata's expectations are compromised as his initiatives will give momentum to the Movement of Change.
In his original position, Mr. Theodorakis will try to say in a low voice to badess the presence. of the river in the movement of change. He will focus in particular on the "sudden and conservative change" of the president, but on the "undemocratic mode of decision-making" that he has adopted. In his initial suggestion, he avoided going into retirement but describing it as a one-way street in order to avoid the "slow political death" of the river and not to risk its consistency at this stage . Mr. Theodorakis does not hide the fact that Potamio's stay in the Movement Movement carries the risk of leaving MPs and therefore the possibility that Potami will not exist in Parliament as a co-ordinated parliamentary group. The result of the afternoon voting should seal the Movement's withdrawal from change, although it is almost certain that not all leaders will follow it, as the Movement of Change tends to be a second chance". Already executives such as Panagiotis Karkatsoulis and Panagiotis Vlachos have declared that they will remain in the Movement of Change
The conference, Makron and the "Leadership Problem"
The question is the way forward Monday. Not only executives who believe that the decision to withdraw from the Movement of Change is equivalent to falling without a parachute. In Sevastopol no illusions. They found that in the polls, 30% to 40% of the voters who chose the river in the September 2015 elections went to undecided voters. They also believe that Mr. Mitsotakis' "good" turn and the "conservative change" Gennimatas left a void in the center of the Center, an audience that does not want to go to ND and SYRIZA and is not fascinated by the stigmatization of the Movement of Change. . Can this small percentage be the basis of the river's self-sustaining survival?
In any case, the creation of a "River Plus", space that will express the strengths of the Modernizing Reform Center, will be attempted in the near future. Basically, Potami will try to present himself in Greece as a representative of the political current expressed in Europe by Makron. During his recent trip to Brussels, Stavros Theodorakis reportedly had contacts with the French president's environmentalists who discussed the party's emergence across Europe during the European elections. This is, as they all point out, the prime objective of Mr Theodorakis: the survival of Potamio through the European elections. The landscape in national elections is different, and if these are held in the fall, it is likely that the Potamos will even have difficulty compiling a number of valid ballots across the country
. It will mark, as it is called, the attempt of a new beginning. To this end, Stavros Theodorakis decided to place a leadership issue in the river and put his leadership on the leadership of party members. Mr. Theodorakis does not intend to retire, he wants to reaffirm his primacy of the grbadroots.
"All together except Stavros"
In the faculty of Phofi Gennimata they consider the departure of Potamia as "a necessary evil".
"Necessary" because there was no other solution where things happened. Mr. Theodorakis can count on polls to claim that he is justified in his criticism, but there is another reading about the polite retreat. This was not because of the political choices made but because of the "turbulent" stigma presented by the Movement for Change because of the attitude of Mr. Theodorakis. In Khar. Trikoupis considers that the claims of "conservative turn" of Sevastopol are premature and they believe that Mr. Theodorakis decided to withdraw from the Movement for Change and that he was simply looking for a cause. "Stavros can not be a soldier but only a general," he said, pointing out that he "could not accept that he was fourth in the local party elections". They also point out that the other members of the Political Council disagreed with the choice of rejection, "but none wanted to give the impression of being ready to give a lifeline to Tsipras, and Theoharopoulos," say they, "was in favor of the agreement, but made it clear that he will vote only on the condition that Al. Tsipras will immediately lead the country to the elections."
"Bad" because even at the level of symbolism, as the appreciation that exists is that the river has no powers, the scope of the company is weakened. This is the first concern of the officers of Phofi Gennimata. Transmit the message that the movement of change is not weakened by the departure of the river and that it continues its course. In this context, the Political Council, the Executive Secretariat and the Central Committee should meet during the week. The goal is to give the image that we "go forward, all together, without Stavros". Indeed, the leaders of Har. Trikoupi believes that during meetings of the Executive Secretariat and Central Committee will take part of the staff of the River, which will give them the right to note that "all cadres do not follow the decision of Stavros"
Phofi Gennimata seems convinced for the accuracy of its choices and believes that after the departure of the River, the Movement of Change should accelerate its pace and prepare the possibility of a vote in October. It will continue its initiatives "to highlight the Movement of Change as a factor of political stability and progressive governance", presenting the framework of positions that will also be on the agenda of any post-election discussions. on the formation of a government in the non-autonomy case of the new party.
The next event will be the event for the local government to be held in Athens on Wednesday, where, after presenting the strategy for the municipal elections, he repeats that the movement of change is evolving regularly on the line of independent course
Low barometric in relations with PES
On Tuesday, Phofi Gennimata will meet Pierre Moskovis as a result of criticism that she has received from European socialists for her position in Macedonian. Their previous meeting in the House was "difficult". Mr Moskovis, according to the information, had put pressure on Mr Tsipras for him to cooperate, which he denied, ruling out such a possibility. The leader of the Movement for Change accepted the criticism that he was absent from the PES meeting last week, leaving Tsipra "playing alone, defying the movement for change". However, it is not certain that his presence would hinder the expression of the "socialism" of the European socialists for Mr Tsipras. "They do not hear anything, even when we put them on the subject of Camden as they did not exist," say officials deeply aware of what is happening in Brussels. Mrs Gennimata repeats that there is no room for cooperation with Mr Tsipras who "appears with a double person: in Europe with the progressive left and in Greece with that of coexisting ethnologist with a party of the far right ".
Source link
