[ad_1]
Journalists published a fake cancer study in a scientific journal as part of a survey they conducted to find the credibility and thoroughness of these prints, reported today. the newspaper Le Monde. to show that no matter who, if paid, can present false scientific facts as true.
Journalists from two German media outlets, the Suddeutsche Zeitung and the NDR public radio sent to the journal Journal of Integrative Oncology, "the results of a clinical study showing that the propolis extract is more effective in the fight against colon cancer than conventional chemotherapy. "
Propolis is produced by honey bees from resinous cortical secretions "The search was fantastic, the data was made and nonexistent authors collaborated with a non-existent research institute, but the text was accepted in less than 10 days and was published on April 24, "explains Monde, as the Athens news agency reports
. The newspaper's website gives a hypertext link that leads to the archived study, which, however, was removed after the scientific inspectors were informed of the case. "Research" indicates that scientists have compared the effectiveness of chemotherapy by administering capsules containing propolis. In addition, the results of the pseudo-study have nothing to do with his subject: they talk about the effects of mbadage on thromboembolic diseases.
German Research Minister Annie Karliczek has ruled in favor of a non-existent study survey. "It's in the interest of science itself," he said, stressing that the credibility and trust of scientists are being affected. "It is good that such errors are revealed, because that is the only way to change them," he said.
This scientific journal is published by the Indian company Omics. World magazine, "dozens of trusted publishers" have created "hundreds of scientific inspections, with free access" for everyone.They do not check at all the quality of their work and ask for to authors "a few hundred euros" for each article.
In valid scientific journals, the publication of a study must first be reviewed by specialists of the same discipline and process Validation generally lasts several months Authors are not always required to pay for publication
An NDR journalist also stated on the radio that he had appeared with a colleague as a computer scientist by the through a fake uni website and false references to scientific articles.
[ad_2]
Source link
