[ad_1]
Senator Josh Hawley, R-Mo., Categorically rejects the idea that he abused his authority or supported an insurgency by opposing the certification of electoral college votes last week.
“This time around, anyone who opposed was called ‘insurgent’,” Hawley wrote in a column in the Southeast Missourian.
“Unfortunately, much of the media and many in the Washington establishment want to deceive Americans into believing that those who have raised concerns are inciting violence, simply by expressing concern. That is wrong. the claim itself is corrosive and dangerous. “
He added that “democratic debate is not popular violence. It is actually how we avoid this violence.”
Hawley and Sen. Ted Cruz, R-Texas, caused a stir after announcing plans to oppose certification ahead of the events of last week. And when Congress reconvened after the attacks, they both maintained their objections.
As calls for JOSH HAWLEY’s resignation grow, Missouri governor remains silent
“Some have wondered why I stuck with my objection to the violence on Capitol Hill,” Hawley wrote. “The reason is simple: I will not bow to a lawless crowd, nor allow criminals to stifle the legitimate concerns of my constituents.”
Hawley noted that his constituents contacted him about concerns about electoral integrity.
His comments came the same day House Democrats and 10 Republicans voted to impeach President Trump for allegedly inciting last week’s attack on the U.S. Capitol. Before that vote, some left and right were targeting Hawley and his colleague from Texas, saying they should be held accountable for opposing certification.
“Those who choose to continue to support his dangerous bet by opposing the results of a legitimate democratic election will forever be seen as complicit in an unprecedented attack on our democracy,” said Senator Mitt Romney, R-Utah , in the midst of the chaos.
Some House Democrats have also expressed support for a resolution urging Congress to hold lawmakers like Hawley accountable. But according to the Missouri senator, he and others were meeting a double standard.
CRUZ DEFENDS ROLE IN ELECTORAL VOTING OBJECTIONS: HAD ‘NOTHING TO DO’ WITH CAPITOL’S BROADCASTING
“Democrats have opposed after the 2000, 2004 and 2016 elections – in other words, every time a Republican has won the White House in the past thirty years,” Hawley wrote.
“And they were entitled to do so. The Joint Session is the forum where concerns about an election can be raised, debated and ultimately resolved by a vote.”
Hawley specifically objected to Pennsylvania’s certification over its decision to expand postal voting, which he said violated the state’s constitution.
A longtime critic of tech giants, Hawley also accused them of interfering with the country’s democratic process.
CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP
“I also opposed to highlight the unprecedented interference of big tech companies in this election for the Biden campaign, not just in Pennsylvania but everywhere,” he said.
“Their interference in our democratic process has only accelerated in recent days.”
[ad_2]
Source link