[ad_1]
Attorney General William Barr has until Monday morning to follow the orders of Democrats in the House to reveal the redacted portions of the Mueller report – or the rest.
But what does "either" remain an open question.
While Barr continues to balk at the appearance of Jerrold Nadler (D-NY), Speaker of the House Judiciary Committee (right), frustrated lawmakers are considering their options: they could censor him, bring him to justice. , dismiss it or even – in theory. – order his arrest.
"We will use every means at our disposal to do our job," said representative Jaime Raskin (D-Md.) Of NPR.
Censorship, or public censure, would be the first step in a possible criminal case against Barr.
In 2012, the House voted for criminal contempt of the Attorney General of the time, Eric Holder, and sued for documents related to the scandal of the use of firearms Fast and Furious.
Dems, whose representative Eric Swalwell (California), has called for an impeachment proceeding against Barr, but his dismissal would require the Republican-majority Senate.
Congress could also invoke its "inherent contempt" power and order the House's Sergeant-at-Arm to put Barr in a state of arrest. However, no arrests in Congress have been ordered since the 1930s and could trigger a fierce battle in the courts. Democrats have shown little appetite for such a radical and improbable measure.
In the meantime, the Ministry of Justice has pursued its own investigations into certain elements of the investigation into collusion with Russia.
A report by the Inspector General on the abuse of the FISA system is expected in the coming weeks and a review of the leak of memos by former FBI director James Comey is also planned.
Barr told the Senate Judiciary Committee last week that he was reviewing the decisions of the FBI and the Department of Justice regarding Hillary Clinton and President Trump's investigations during the 2016 campaign.
[ad_2]
Source link