[ad_1]
Powerful counterattack against the US government, the Ministry of Commerce can do it!
A few hours ago, in response to a series of reasons put forward by the US government to launch a trade war against China, the Ministry of Commerce also issued a detailed statement refuting the views of the United States.
But in these rebuttals, there is a refutation that makes you simple.
This refusal by the Ministry of Commerce is directed against the United States, who claims that they "patiently did Chinese work". On the one hand, he accuses us of saying "disregard" and "do not respond actively".
(The photo shows the charge issued by the US Embbady on the China's "non-sincerity") The rebuttal made by the Ministry is that the US allegations are not consistent with the facts. The real situation is that China has only conducted four high-level consultations with the United States. US delegation between February and June of this year Sino-US Joint Statement
"But the US side disagrees with national political needs, and has repeatedly turned its back on consensus on both sides and insisted on a trade war with China … "The Ministry of Commerce reprimanded the statement.
This refutation also makes you direct. Because the situation mentioned by the Ministry of Commerce has been fully exposed and disclosed by the US media, this can be strong evidence for us to counter the false claims of the United States.
Among them, what directly impressed Zhigang, is the one that was led by US Treasury Secretary Mnuchin in Beijing in early May this year. Because during this negotiation, a very serious guilt erupted within the US delegation and quickly attracted the attention of almost all US media.
Yan Zhige also clearly remembered the report and description of the guilty controversy of the US delegation at the time: US Treasury Secretary Mnuchin met with our negotiators alone, along with his colleagues, senior consultant White House. Navarro took part in a battle of "dirty words".
According to US media reports, the conflict was provoked by Navarro because he was unhappy with Mnuchin's modest negotiating stance and the exclusion of his "hawks" from negotiations. Therefore, Navarro did not care about his image as an official, and directly confronted Mnuchin in front of the office building where China and the United States were holding negotiations …
American Media New York Times "added The people were then completely separated in the plane that was returning to the United States, and they remained silent for a long time.
At that time, a number of US media outlets, including CNN, also reported in comments that it fully proved that Trump's commercial team is extremely chaotic and lacks policy coherence. Some US media are also concerned that letting such a chaotic trade team negotiate with China will lead China to wonder what the United States wants and even catastrophic consequences.
However, in trade negotiations with China, this kind of inconsistency on the part of the US delegation has long been a rare event, not just the differences of opinion evident within the company. Team, but even US representatives negotiating with China do not necessarily represent US President Trump. . The US media has also fully revealed this aspect.
For example, the "New York Times" of the United States reported that after the United States and the United States negotiated on May 19 the "Sino-US Joint Statement", agreed to reduce the trade deficit, a large number of US goods and services. Mnuchin also said publicly that the Sino-US trade war and related tariff measures have been suspended. At the time, US Secretary of Commerce Ross was also preparing to travel to China to continue to implement the results of the negotiations.
"After only two weeks, Trump will not only personally announce that he will continue to fight against the trade war with China, but he also wants to launch trade wars against Canada, Mexico and the United States. European Union … "
Some American media have wondered: if you talk about it for a long time, what Americans say is not counted, what do the Chinese think?
So, we could wish to show the reports of these American media. With these detailed and enriched reports as evidence, the outside world will more clearly recognize that our refutation of the American part of "repetition, rebellion, and open abandonment of consensus on both sides" is not arbitrary, but justified.
[ad_2]
Source link
Tags Commerce counterattack government Hong Kong Ministry Sina strong