Home / United States / House Democrats decide Bernie Sanders' plan to socialize health care does not go far enough

House Democrats decide Bernie Sanders' plan to socialize health care does not go far enough

SSocialist Senator Bernie Sanders proposed transferring the entire country to a socialized health insurance plan in the next four years, a plan that would cost $ 32 trillion over a decade. On Thursday, a group of more than 100 Democrat Members of the House will introduce a bill aimed at achieving the same goal in just two years.

Representative Pramila Jayapal, D-Wash., Main sponsor of the plan, did not explain how the proposal would be paid.

"I have a lot of ideas on how we can pay for this," Jayapal said at a teleconference, reported my colleague Kimberly Leonard. "The question is not how we pay for it, but the question is: where is the desire to ensure that every American has the health care that he deserves and to which he is entitled? "

Other countries where health systems have been socialized have much higher taxes than the United States, including a much heavier burden for the middle class.

The plan also does not explain how the Democrats intend to convert a US $ 3.5 trillion sector of the economy and push nearly 180 million people into private insurance in 24 months, without cause massive upheavals. As with Sanders' proposal, the plan would eliminate private primary insurance, allowing only specialized plans that can not cover any of the benefits provided by the government plan.

These plans are likely to be very close, as they also aim to make coverage more generous and promising, but not promising for prescription drugs, mental health, long-term care, dental care, eye care and others. medical services.

How will the system train enough health professionals to meet the demand created by providing free and expanded coverage to the general population? For the socialist wing of the reborn Democratic Party, these questions are only for modest minds.

According to the plan, Americans would have "freedom of choice" because they "allow any person entitled to benefits to obtain services from any qualified supplier to participate under the law". Of course, in practice, the government can absolutely not guarantee that the preferred health care providers of the population would be willing to absorb the inevitable reductions in payments needed to control the costs of such a plan.

At the same time, the plan would confer extraordinary discretion on the Secretary of Health and Social Services, a role already reinforced under Obamacare. For example, the HHS secretary would now have the power to "determine residency requirements".

By introducing this bill now, the Socialists aim to clearly mark what the "public health insurance scheme for all" really means, to prevent it from being co-opted but ultimately diluted by Democrats who are trying to appeal to a wider electorate. But from a political point of view, it's more a fantasyland thought.

Note: To explain why I would define such a plan as socialist, read here.

xfbml : true, version : 'v2.9' }); };

(function(d, s, id){ var js, fjs = d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0]; if (d.getElementById(id)) {return;} js = d.createElement(s); js.id = id; js.src = "http://connect.facebook.net/en_US/sdk.js"; fjs.parentNode.insertBefore(js, fjs); }(document, 'script', 'facebook-jssdk')); -->
Source link