House Dems reintroduces the Dream Act



[ad_1]

House Democrats unveiled Tuesday a new version of the Dream Act as part of a renewed debate on financing border security.

This is the latest version of a proposal that has received varying degrees of bipartisan support since 2001 but has never managed to surpass both chambers.

Proponents of the bill say that this time they are aiming to get it signed by law President TrumpDonald John TrumpTrump: Socialism "on which it is easy to campaign, but difficult to govern" Stone's defense refuses to use a court to advertise for the release of his book Ocasio-Cortez: Trump gives the tone of "misogyny, racism, conspiracy theory" – or at least in front of the Senate and Trump's office.

The proposal includes a path to citizenship for many "dreamers" – undocumented immigrants who have arrived in the country as minors – and beneficiaries of temporary protection status (TPS) and delayed forced departure (DED), but does not include any provision relating to border security or immigration enforcement funding.

In total, the Dreams and Promises Act of 2019 could confer permanent immigration status on millions of people.

Together, dreamers and recipients of GST and DED form a population of immigrants who have no legal status or who could lose it – but have never made the conscious decision to violate US immigration law .

This has helped advocate for legislation to protect these groups, and Democrats are relying on polls, which show that 80% of voters are in favor of legislation in this area, to get Republicans to come to the polls. question.

"Whether you are Democrat or Republican, on our trip in 2020, we have to think about the wishes of our constituency and I think they want relief for these young people," said the representative. Adriano EspaillatAdriano de Jesus Espaillat CabralDems intensifies the examination of Kushner's security clearance Here are the lawmakers who will lose their salary when closing the prison. 8 year old boy dies in CBP custody. MORE (D-N.Y.).

The bill is likely to come before the House and will garner some support from the Republicans, but it will face stiff resistance to reach the 60-vote threshold in the GOP Senate.

"We are going to put pressure on, we will do our job and get him out of the House, and we will do our best to get him out of the Senate, and I know that all the weight of the country will be on the White House to pass this project. of law because these young people have given a face to this movement.This is not an anonymous move, "said Espaillat, a member of the Democratic Whip's House team.

But the Republicans who have backed previous versions of the Dream Act are crazy about what they call the failure of Democrats to reach the other side of this version. Most earlier versions of the Dream Act included Republican co-sponsors from the start.

"I hope the Democrats will work with people to get something done, I was worried that they would do something knowing that this could not be done for political reasons, and it is what it is ", Rep. Mario Diaz-BalartMario Rafael Diaz-BalartTrump will authorize lawsuits against seizures of Cuban real estate Eight Republicans and Dems will vie for background checks for the sale of firearms A house will approve a bill expanding rapidly on firearms sales PLUS (R-Fla.) Said.

Diaz-Balart, a veteran of several immigration reform talks, said he could end up voting for the Democratic proposal, but criticized the Democratic leaders for using this issue to score points policies.

"I voted for this 37 million times, of course.I do not want to go into the assumptions.I must see it.That said, I voted for things like this one hundred of The question is whether – if in fact that's what they do – have a chance to become law – I would answer no, "said Diaz-Balart.

Democrats, who had promised to act on immigration reform during the first hundred days of their majority in the House, have chosen to override the often tedious process of bargaining with their opponents.

They are banking on the support of moderate Republicans who have voted in favor of similar proposals in the past, but also on the use of Trump's words against him.

Trump administration officials said that temporary programs and decrees should not replace congressional legislation.

Democrats say the Dream and Promise Act is a way to test Trump's commitment on his own words.

"It never needed to be like that. [the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals program]. We could have continued to do the GST. But this administration has just chosen to crack down without any interest to try to repair it, "said the representative. Pramila JayapalPramila Jayapal's "Medicare for All" does not address the financial incentives needed by doctors. Democratic leaders and progressives argue over & # 39; Medicare for all. (D-Wash.), An immigration policy expert who co-chairs the Progressive Caucus of Congress.

And the Democrats are not afraid to put pressure on the far right of the Republican Party.

representative Zoe LofgrenZoe Ellen LofgrenKey President of Democracy Expresses Skepticism on "Health Insurance for All" Bill Women's Hygiene Products Will Be Available to Legislators Using Congressional Funds . (D-Calif.), Chair of the House's Subcommittee on the Judiciary of the House on Immigration and Citizenship, said that Republicans "should be able to vote for [the bill]. "

"People who want to regularize the status of Dreamers can adhere to this bill.Many of those who say that we must first do X or Y do not really want to do it at all," said Lofgren.

"I've been serving with them for 25 years, they will never support a bill, I do not understand what they think, but it's where they are," she said. added.

Nevertheless, the last Dream Act offers no consideration to regularize the status of millions of people.

His supporters say that's a feature of the bill. Its critics say it's a terminal problem.

"We have just made a big border security bill, in which we have spent billions of dollars on border security, so we do not need to be threatened to do it. part of our job, "said Lofgren.

"Some people say we should do E-Verify, if you did it in the US, we would not have salads – I mean, you have to reform the system and then enforce the rules," he said. she adds.

Diaz-Balart said that political calculation simply does not work that way.

"I keep hearing about these bipartisan efforts.They have not spoken to anyone.This is not an attempt to do anything.It is an attempt to score points. "Because if you want to do it, it's not rocket science," he said.

"It's the fact that everyone knows that if you want to do something like that, it will take border security to be able to do such things," Diaz-Balart added. "If we can pretend that they can do it without consulting anyone, without involving any Republican, and knowingly doing so, it means that they are knowingly trying to do something that will not happen." not law, which is unfortunate. "

[ad_2]

Source link