[ad_1]
Some might call it “toxic”, but Rep. Matt Gaetz might simply be “stronger than yesterday”.
The Florida congressman is asking the House Judiciary Committee to hold a hearing on court-ordered preservations, specifically referring to the #FreeBritney movement.
Gaetz – who, in addition to being an avid Donald Trump fan, is apparently a longtime Spears fan – is fighting to have the pop star released from his court-ordered guardianship, as part of his request to the Congress to hold a hearing. on the regular guardianship procedure.
In a letter to Representative Jerry Nadler, Chairman of the House Judiciary Committee, Gaetz and Congressman Jim Jordan name the recent New York Times documentary “Framing Britney Spears,” which put the spotlight directly in the spotlight. guardianship of the pop princess.
“The House Justice Committee is charged with protecting the rights granted to Americans by the US Constitution. These rights include the free will to run one’s own affairs and legal autonomy over one’s own finances. When situations suggest the unjust deprivation of these rights from the government, we have an obligation to monitor and explore potential remedies, ”the letter said.
“In recent years, the public has become increasingly concerned about the use of guardianship to effectively deprive individuals of their personal freedoms at the request of others through the manipulation of the courts,” the letter continued, submitted on March 8. .
“Perhaps the most striking example is the case of multi-platinum performer Britney Spears,” write Gaetz and Jordan.
The letter specifically calls out Spears’ father, Jamie Spears, who is his co-curator. Through court appearances and legal letters from the star’s court-appointed attorney, Spears noted that she was “afraid” of her father and refused to perform again until her father. is no longer in charge of his career.
“The facts and circumstances that gave rise to this arrangement remain in dispute, but involve questionable legal motives and tactics on the part of his father and now conservative Jamie Spears,” the letter said, later stating that despite the “pleas” of the musician, his father remains a curator of his field.
In a hearing held just days after the documentary premiered, a judge dismissed Spears’ father’s objections to a joint guardianship order, while denying the star’s request to remove his father from guardianship entirely. Jamie Spears remains co-curator, alongside Bessemer Trust Co.
“It’s no secret that my client doesn’t want her father as a co-curator, but we recognize that the referral is a separate issue,” the singer’s lawyer said, addressing the court, at a hearing last month.
In the letter, Gaetz writes, “Ms. Spears is not alone … Given the constitutional freedoms at stake and the opacity of these arrangements, it is incumbent on our committee to convene a hearing to consider whether the Americans are unfairly trapped in guardianship. “
Spears’ guardianship has been the subject of controversy since 2008, when the star was placed in the court-ordered arrangement. With the recent documentary, public interest exploded and Spears received widespread support from his legions of fans around the world, in addition to prominent celebrities, like Howard Stern, Kim Kardashian West and Sarah Jessica Parker, who stood for have publicly spoken out against Spears’ Guardianship, since she watched the doc
Now that Spears’ situation is turning into a federal issue, it might be time to move on to #FreeBritney.
[ad_2]
Source link