[ad_1]
The proposed changes to House of Representatives rules would “respect all gender identities” by removing specific terms such as mother and father, son and daughter, aunt and uncle.
Instead, only non-sexist terms such as “parent”, “child”, “brother or sister” and “brother or sister of parent” would be allowed in the text of the rules of procedure, in accordance with the proposed changes.
The proposed changes – which also include the creation of a “Diversity and Inclusion Office” in the House – will be voted on after the House meets on Sunday for the new 117th Congress.
Another rule change would prevent Republicans from amending a bill at the last minute, the Washington Examiner reported.
Instead, such proposed changes would send the bill back to committee, effectively killing it, the reviewer noted.
House Speaker Nancy Pelosi said this was necessary so that last-minute law changes – known as restart motions – are no longer used to hijack the legislative process for political game purposes.
The new rules will make the House “the most inclusive in history,” Pelosi said as he announced the proposed changes.
But the gender neutralization movement – a nod to the transgender, non-binary community – has been widely ridiculed on social media.
“As you can see, Congress really has its finger on America’s pulse,” the conservative Daily Caller whistled on Twitter.
“Is this some kind of a plan to generate confusion by obfuscation?” @tweeting_chance replied to the tweet. “Don’t we already have enough in our legislation?”
Other changes would remove the speaking privileges of former members of the House convicted of crimes relating to their service or election to the House and constitute a violation of the Official Code of Conduct for a Member of the House or an employee of the House. disclose the identity of a whistleblower.
Members of the House and their employees would also be prohibited from broadcasting “manipulated media”, including “deepfakes”.
[ad_2]
Source link