[ad_1]
The last "live" reboot of a Disney-animated classic is The Lion King. Almost exactly 25 years after its release in movie theaters, director Jon Favreau gave life to Shakespeare's inspired story of an African animal kingdom ruled by lions, unseated by a jealous parent. So, how does this new take differ from the original? We will take a look.
The actors of the voice
Because of the time elapsed, it would make no sense for the same actors to express all the characters. Jonathan Taylor Thomas has grown up (and is actually out of the trade), and most of the others from the original are at different places in their careers. Although there are a handful of big names (including Nathan Lane, Rowan Atkinson and Whoopi Goldberg), it is nothing compared to the voice expressed this time.
Disney a lot money to bring that kind of talent. As you can see above, there are Donald Glover, Billy Eichner, Seth Rogen, John Oliver, Chiwetel Ejiofor, and many other well-known names. And of course, let's not forget Queen Beyoncé Knowles-Carter. Only James Earl Jones, who voiced Mufasa in the original, came back for the remake.
The film turns
The animation class lasts 88 minutes, a little less than an hour and a half. It was pretty normal for the time. After all, movies for young children have always been a little shorter than those intended for an older audience and have a capacity for attention.
However, the new movie is a bit longer, reaching 118 minutes (so just under two hours). According to Favreau, "there are a lot of scenes that are not in the original. make the viewing experience a little more exciting.
There is more improvisation
In the past, Disney was not exactly the champion of flying scripts. When your business is considered a well-oiled machine, this is more than just a course. But over the years, and with the addition of various brands under the Disney umbrella, each with its own unique tone and audience, this idea has become less of a frowned upon idea.
Given Favreau's track record, Disney probably knew there would be a few improvements here and there. Especially with regard to his most comical actors, like Billy Eichner and Seth Rogen (Timon and Pumbaa, respectively). Favreau told Jimmy Kimmel: "Both are so funny. We recorded them together. We played in a rehearsal theater and recorded their voices. So you see a more natural improvisation. "
A more realistic look
The idea of a real action remake does not work exactly for The Lion King as it does for, let's say Aladdin or The beauty and the Beast. There are CGI characters in the last two, but there are also real people. With this remake, each character was a CGI animal, although intended to look like a very realistic rendering of each species.
However, there is a blow that is not CGI. Favreau told Kimmel, "All the environments you see were entirely computer generated. Each performance was animated with keyframes.
He then described the process used to take pictures in Africa and recreate them in a virtual reality environment. He was not able to confirm what shot was, but that's part of the attraction of seeing a movie like The Lion King it seems to be a real action and to determine what is really.
Check out the Showbiz cheat sheet on Facebook!
[ad_2]
Source link