I refuse to buy another flagship product with no refresh rate greater than or equal to 90Hz

Each year brings a new list of trends in smartphones and, as 2019 advances through the second half, it is clear that automakers are focusing on this year. Waterdrop notches and punched camera cutouts are in, headphone jacks continue to be erased from the surface of the Earth, and on-screen fingerprint sensors are the next solution for continue to eliminate the glasses.

Another feature is starting to become more important this year: it displays fast refresh rates. After Razer Phone introduced this concept in late 2017, it was introduced this year with a more significant showcase with phones such as the OnePlus 7 Pro, ASUS ROG Phone 2, and possibly in the next Google Pixel 4.

Although they are not as popular as some of the other trends seen in 2019, the fast refresh rate displays have remained something special to me. And, if I'm quite honest, it's hard for me to get excited about new phones that are marketed without this feature.

Take the Galaxy Note 10 and Note 10+, for example. Both phones are incredibly compelling handsets, offering stunning AMOLED displays, high-speed performance, reliable rear-view cameras, excellent battery, and more. Unfortunately, both phones have the traditional 60Hz refresh rate.

Both phones have incredible screens, especially the Note 10+, but after using the OnePlus 7 Pro as a daily driver, getting back to something with a 60Hz panel seems archaic. I had to buy a 10+ Note for the job, and although I want to check, I do not expect this phone to become my favorite phone, simply because it does not have a 90Hz or 120Hz display.

Putting as much importance on a function can seem dramatic, and if you have not seen a quick refresh screen in person, I do not blame you. However, after using one for me, it becomes impossible to return to a device without it.

Not only is a faster refresh rate more enjoyable to watch, but it also gives the impression that a phone is moving faster than a handset without a phone. Compare two phones with the same processor, such as the OnePlus 7 Pro and the Note 10, and the 7 Pro will seem faster than the Note since everything on the screen refreshes much faster.

Now more than ever, flagship phones need to justify their price tags over $ 1000.

There may be no real difference between the performance of either phone, but as the 7 Pro's display screen refreshes faster, it will look brighter than Note 10 by a considerable margin.

I may like this feature more than the average user, but despite this, it's a little silly that we are asked to spend a thousand dollars or more for a stuck flagship phone at the rate of 60Hz – especially when OnePlus and ASUS have shown that you can include a 90Hz or 120Hz display in a phone costing around $ 700.

The flagship smartphones are supposed to offer the best of the market, and a fast refresh rate is objectively higher than that of a traditional phone. Not only that, but with the medium and low-end market that is continually improving, the leading companies must do everything in their power to provide a compelling reason to spend hundreds of extra dollars rather than content with the latest Moto G phone.

I think we'll finally get to the point where 90Hz + displays are becoming commonplace, but we do not know how long it will take until we get there. The rumor is about the adoption of this feature by the Pixel 4, but Samsung, LG, Huawei, Apple and most other companies have shown no interest to date to integrate this technology on their phones.

Hope this changes as soon as possible.

We can earn a commission for purchases using our links. Learn more.