If the New York Times can not publish anti-Semitic cartoons, it will not push any cartoon



[ad_1]

The official New York Times response to the appearance of an anti-Semitic political cartoon in its April 15 international edition was, ironically, a cartoon.

In fact, the newspaper will no longer publish daily political cartoons in its international edition, thus ending long contracts with cartoonists Patrick Chappatte and Heng Kim Song, announced Monday the publisher of the editorial page James Bennet.

It's as if the newspaper was saying, "If we can not make political cartoons containing anti-Semitic themes, then we can no longer make political cartoons."

The simplest solution would simply be to eliminate caricatures containing obvious anti-Jewish fanaticism or declared fanaticism. But I suppose the Times does not trust the ability of its writers to be discerning.

"We are very grateful and proud of the work done [Chappatte and Heng] have done for the international edition of the New York Times, which circulates abroad, Bennet said in a statement. "[H]However, he adds in a statement, "for more than a year, we plan to align this edition with the national newspaper by ending daily political cartoons starting July 1". .

Bennet's announcement came after the newspaper had already stopped publishing all the political cartoons subscribed.

Although his statement suggests that the decision to cut the daily cartoons of the international edition was ongoing well before the publication of a cartoon depicting a blind president wearing the yarmulke, led by Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu , presented as a man with a wide nose. David's star service dog, some do not buy it.

And by "some" I hear at least one of the contract designers that the New York Times has just given.

"I put down my pen with a sigh: years of work have been canceled by a single cartoon – not even mine – that should never have appeared in the best newspaper in the world," said Chappatte on his website Internet.

In April, after the newspaper published the anti-Semitic and anti-Netanyahu cartoon in its international edition, the paper had slowed down its response, saying generic declaration on social networks, "the picture was shocking and it was a misjudgment to publish it". The newspaper adds that this bland statement will appear in the April 29 issue.

Times spokeswoman Eileen Murphy issued a longer statement later on April 28 in which she tried to apologize for the cartoon.

The caricature, which was removed from the Times' website shortly after critics had highlighted its obvious anti-Semitic themes, was created by Portuguese cartoonist António Moreira Antunes, the Times reported. By the way, Antunes blamed the "Jewish propaganda machine" for his negative reaction to his drawing, in case you wondered what would have motivated him to draw it as he did.

Honestly, the management of this event by the Times could not be worse. It would be better for the newspaper to publish offensive material and defend it, instead of falling back on that strange and childish attitude that I take my ball and go home. It's a coward and a censor, which is also not a good look for an ostensibly free and candid newspaper.

[ad_2]

Source link