"In all respects, this is more important than Watergate."



[ad_1]

Adam Schiff, chairman of the House's Intelligence Committee, speaks at a news conference on April 18, 2019 in Burbank, California.

Adam Schiff, chairman of the House's Intelligence Committee, speaks at a news conference on April 18, 2019 in Burbank, California.

Mario Tama / Getty Images

House Intelligence Committee Representative Adam Schiff rejected suggestions that Special Rapporteur Robert Mueller's report findings were not as serious as he and other Democrats had suggested. In particular, the allegations of obstruction of justice that are set out in the Mueller report are "far worse than anything Richard Nixon has done," Schiff said.

The host of ABC This weekMartha Raddatz asked Schiff about her previous statements comparing the Trump administration's actions with Watergate, leaving her open for some of those comments. But Schiff, who has become a prime target for Republicans since Attorney General William Barr published his summary of the Mueller report, made it clear that his previous statements about the gravity of the president's misdeeds continued.

"The obstruction of justice especially in this case is far worse than anything Richard Nixon did," Schiff said. "The Russian invasion of democratic institutions, a far more important foreign adversary than the plumbers who have entered the headquarters of the Democrats. So, yes, I would say in all respects that this is more important than Watergate. "Beyond that, Schiff also said that the way Trump" would not defend himself and resist the interference of Russia in our election, but would like it to go well beyond any Nixon did it. "One of the main reasons why" I think it's much more serious than Watergate "is to take the side of Moscow on that of its own intelligence agencies.

When asked if Trump was obstructing justice, Schiff said that as far as he was concerned, there was no doubt about it, noting that obstruction was being inflicted on him. several ways. it was perfectly clear that he did not think he could accuse the president "and, beyond that," I also think that he also could not say that the president should be indicted because it would be actually the same thing. Mueller "almost said that the evidence of the obstruction was evidence of a crime as much as he could in the regulations of the Department of Justice."

[ad_2]
Source link