[ad_1]
“I can write anything on Facebook and it’s pulled, checked,” Kim Ashworth, a Trump supporter I met at a “Stop the Steal” event, told me to protest the outcome. election in Atlanta two weeks ago. “Everything about elections, Donald Trump, they take it.”
Kari Tingley, who was also at the protest in Atlanta, told me that Twitter put a restriction on her account after sharing a post saying the masks were not effective in fighting the spread of Covid-19. This claim is false, but she believes it.
Twitter has most likely taken action against his account because it has rules against dangerous Covid-19 disinformation.
But while many Trump supporters I’ve spoken to have taken to alternative social media platforms, almost none of them have completely given up on services like Facebook and Twitter.
But the idea of people trying other platforms because they think their conversations are being stifled on Facebook and Twitter could help explain Big Tech’s historical reluctance to crack down on disinformation.
Facebook and Twitter were slow to fight disinformation on their platforms, and only really did so after the general outcry following the 2016 election. Facebook and Twitter executives were dragged to Congress for explain how their platforms were used by people here and in Russia to promote division and spread lies. Secret Russian troll group posted bogus social media pages seen by millions of Americans and all of this apparently went undetected by tech giants
Ahead of the 2020 election, both companies created new policies, tweaked some algorithms, and added new features, such as how companies can report misinformation to users.
But it creates its own set of challenges and irritations against users who believe or are told by the President and other leading conservatives to believe in disinformation.
Now, every fact-check on Facebook and every tag on Twitter sets a new standard by which these companies will be judged.
In a recent Senate hearing, Twitter CEO Jack Dorsey was asked why Twitter flagged some Trump tweets as disinformation, but not a tweet from the Iranian Supreme Leader who defended the denial of the Holocaust.
It is a logical and fair question. And that means why these companies are desperate to become, in Mark Zuckerberg’s words, “arbiter of truth.” They see it as a slippery slope.
But Parler, and the people who join him, could also find themselves on a slippery slope.
Accounts with swastikas as profile photos and disgusting racist posts aren’t hard to find on Talk.
[ad_2]
Source link