2.0 Movie Review: Despite Rajinikanth and Akshay Kumar, Bunkum is Bunkum



[ad_1]

Interpretation: Rajinikanth, Akshay Kumar, Amy Jackson

Director: Shankar S

Rating: 2 out of 5 stars

He is back. This time, Chitti is reloaded and ready to face a force that seeks to eliminate mobile phones and mobile towers from Tamil Nadu. The battle between good and evil, between nature and technology takes place over two and a half hours in an area where all lines of demarcation are blurred, creating the possibility of multiple interpretations. But as the narrative is well robotic, frenetic action sequences rarely reach the heights achieved by flying mobiles. The film speaks at length about the sad reality of sparrows disappearing from our metropolis – a theme discussed in newspapers and social media – but the pressing nature of the debate is buried under an impressive and animatronic demo, from Special effects and prostheses. .

Eight years is a long time in the life of a movie star. But for Rajnikanth, any hiatus can only be a flash 2.0 continued from the director and co-writer Shankar to the years 2010 Enthiran ( Robot in Hindi ), materialized after the Tamil cinema supernova used the long pause to appear in four films ( of Kochadaiiyaan, Lingaa, Kabali and Kaala ). It's been longer than it took Dr. Vaseegaran to evoke Chitti's thinking robot. The film and its star show obvious signs of wear. For Rajnikanth fans, however, it should not be a minor irritant.

  ahe61rfg

Rajinikanth in 2.0

A mysterious power – its genesis is established in the opening sequence of the film in which a man hangs from a mobile tower – is eliminating the mobile phone from the face The towers are uprooted and crushed. The handsets spring from the hands of their owners and turn into a destructive wave. A city is plagued by total chaos. The army is called but the soldiers are left blank. The good scientist is advised to bring Chitti back to life, which, he says, is the only effective option to fight the new threat. Elements of the administration are opposed to his plan. out of control, Vaseegaran clears a free hand.

" Maut se zinda lautne ka mazaa kuch aur hi hai (nothing can equal the joy of coming back alive from death)," says Chitti in the Hindi version of the film (author of the dialogue: Abbas Tyrewala) just before declaring: "I am the one who is great," Who dares to question him? Nila (Amy Jackson), humanoid, another creation of Vaseegaran. At first glance, the main actor delves into the universe of the two main characters – the invincible robot and his brilliant creator – with all his might. But look deeper and his enthusiasm and confidence in the project are visibly fading. Fans sold on Rajnikanth's relentless starry-coldness might therefore have reason to feel somewhat shaken.

With Akshay Kumar, during his very first foray into the south of the country, exuding both the power of the stars and the emotional energy in the second half of the aging Ornithologist film, livid to the rapid decline of the number of birds, then as a revenge seeker of the avian deaths, 2.0 would have been considered an improved and more solid version of his predecessor if the plot had been a little more convincing.

  tiocvqv >

. ] Akshay Kumar in 2.0

Of course, the director Shankar has a penchant for the definition of the fantastic and the unreal in the human dilemma felt. He fully exploits this attribute to deal with the damage caused by cellular radiation But the frustration of the activist who fights to save the birds but fails in his mission is not sufficiently revealed to justify the murderous crusade launched by Pakshirajan (Akshay Kumar) against sellers and mobile phone users. The superficiality of his war is manifested by the way he kills a wholesaler, a transmission tower owner and a telecommunications minister: one blew, the other crashed, the other crashed with a cellphone inlaid with diamonds

Amy Jackson in the role of the super efficient robot that is up to the task and that all its master is mechanical but just enough to not be overwhelmed by this sci-fi action movie designed mainly for the larger than- Rajnikanth life, nice screen screen to the crowd.

  9d97p79g

Amy and Jackson in 2.0

Supporting actors in a Rajnikanth vehicle have a limited purpose. This is no different in 2.0 although the cast of the film includes Adil Hussain in the role of the Minister of the Interior, a man charged with formulating an answer to the attack mobile phones. But his agency is quickly withdrawn while Vaseegaran, Chitti and Nila take over while a powerful opponent threatens to invade the city.

The most expensive Indian film ever mounted worthy of any money invested. ? It seems and sounds good for most. It whistles thanks to the breathless action and the dazzling VFX. 2.0 however, would have been a much larger film if the script had dared to go beyond the known tricks of the genre. Chitti and Nila seem to be entangled in a romantic atmosphere, both able to feel and express their love. But this track remains an insignificant secondary plot in a movie in which even the villain is a star on Bollywood 's star list and must be part of a respectable part of the action, especially when it' s all over the place. it does not enter until after the intermission. ]

The right / wrong tropes that 2.0 employ are bbad, but the battle at the heart of the film opposes a deformed development model to the need for ecological conservation in a fantasy flawless – has both stimulating and entertaining moments. But even for Rajnikanth, getting out of this erratic and messy epic is not a good deal. He comes close enough. Look 2.0 for its scale and ambition, if not for the superstar who can not go wrong.

[ad_2]
Source link