[ad_1]
The Supreme Court on Wednesday handed down a major victory to Delhi Prime Minister and AAP National Chief Arvind Kejriwal in his fierce fight against Lieutenant-Governor (LG) Anil Baijal, saying that the LG does not want to see it. does not have the power to make decisions.
"There is no place for absolutism and there is no room for anarchism," said the judge to five judges of the court Supreme Court in a unanimous decision of Chief Justice Dipak Misra. The decision also found that the LG, who is appointed by the Center, can not act as an "obstructionist".
The decision also establishes for the first time clear guidelines for the conduct of the LG and delimits the powers of the two branches. the executive in Delhi, which does not have the full status of state, elects its own deputies and its government.
The Supreme Court stated that, except for three issues – law and order, police and land – the Delhi government has the power to legislate and govern on other matters.
He added that all decisions of the Council of Ministers must be communicated to the GL, but that does not mean that his consent was necessary.
ALSO READ: SC says LG should listen to ministers, Kejriwal tweets democracy wins
The verdict triggered celebrations among supporters and workers of the Aam Aadmi Party (AAP), who were dancing in the streets, distributing sweets and beat drums. 19659002] "A great victory for the people of Delhi … a great victory for democracy", tweeted by Kejriwal
A great victory for the people of Delhi … a great victory for democracy …
– Arvind Kejriwal (@ArvindKejriwal) 4 July 2018
His deputy, Manish Sisodia, called the judgment "historic" and recalled the historic mandate that the people of Delhi had given to the AAP during the elections February 2015 when the party won 67 of the 70 seats.
AAP salutes SC verdict, accuses Modi govt of creating chaos
Sighing with relief on Supreme Court verdict, PAA leadership accuses administration headed by Narendra Modi ] to create "chaos". "In the National Capital in the last three and a half years
Kejriwal hailed the Supreme Court's verdict as a" great victory "for the people of Delhi and democracy.
" Can Modiji revokes 3 years 5 months of chaos in Delhi? Will the people of Delhi forgive BJP for ruining 3 years and 5 months? ", Asked AAP spokesman Saurabh Bhardwaj in a tweet
IMPORTANT – May Modi ji revoke 3 years and 5 months of chaos in Delhi?
Will the people of Delhi forgive to BJP for having ruined 3 years and 5 months? – Saurabh Bharadwaj (@Saurabh_MLAgk) 4 July 2018
It draws a parallel between the previous congressional government led by Sheila Dikshit in Delhi and the current regime of PAA and stressed how the ruling party was prevented from working in the national capital.
"AAP Govt was formed in February 2015, three months later, in May 2015, Modi Govt brought this notice which removed & # 39; service & # 39; This means that Sheila Dixit Govt had full control over his officers / employees, Kejriwal Govt was left unchecked (sic). "
" Modi Govt was formed in May 2014 and two months later, Modi Govt brought a notice that Sheila Dixit had ACB for 15 years but was taken away because Modi was too afraid of Arvind Kejriwal and his ACB (sic), "said Bhardwaj in a series of tweets.
REMINDER 1 – AAP Govt was formed in February 2015, three months later, in May 2015, Modi Govt brought this notification which removed from "services" to AAP Govt
This means that Sheila Dixit Govt had full control over his officers / employees, Kejriwal Govt was left without any control.
– Saurabh Bharadwaj (@Saurabh_MLAgk) 4 July 2018
REMINDER 2 – Modi Govt was formed in May 2014 and two months later, Modi Govt brought a notification which removed the powers of the anti-corruption branch . [19659018] Means Sheila Dixit had ACB for 15 years but was taken away because Modi was too scared of Arvind Kejriwal and her ACB. pic.twitter.com/tFuHC3EVOX
– Saurabh Bharadwaj (@Saurabh_MLAgk) July 4, 2018
He also stated that the provision of badistance and advice from the elected government was binding for the LG during Dikshit "Under Sheila Dixit Govt, the aid and the elected government council were binding on LG, who was not free to reject the plans." For Kejriwal Govt, LG is free to make decisions, dismissed all the important decisions of the CCTV government, delivery of the Ration ration, Muholla clinics rejected or delayed, "said the head of the PAA tweeted.
3-Under Sheila Dixit Govt, Aid & Advice of The elected government was bound by LG. LG was not free to reject projects
For Kejriwal Govt, LG is free to make decisions, rejected all important decisions of Govt.CCTV, the ration delivery stage, Muholla clinics rejected or delayed pic.twitter.com/ OozXCLOjXo– Saurabh Bharadwaj (@Saurabh_MLAgk) July 4, 2018
The Supreme Court decision on Wednesday was a great victory for the PAA government, which had been in constant conflict with the LG about powers exercised by the two branches of the APA. l & # 39; executive.
ALSO READ: Who governs Delhi: SC answers a question that has been asked for decades
After the verdict of the SC, the BJP says that the PAA should avoid any claim from the state
Verdict of the Supreme Court and stated that the ruling party should now avoid its "political claim" from the complete state to the city
BJP deputy and chief of opposition to the Delhi Assembly Vijender Gupta said the verdict Wednesday ordered the PAA government to follow the law and it is expected that they will do so.
"We welcome the verdict of the SC The Delhi government should have followed the law even without the order of the court." Praveen Shankar Kapoor, spokesperson for the BJP in Delhi, said the verdict "Decided" that Delhi is a territory of the Union and that the PAA should stop raising their "political demand" of city.
"It is now decided in Delhi is a UT. Thus, the PAA and Chief Minister Arvind Kejriwal should stop raising full state demand. "
ALSO READ: AAP to set up 3,000 centers in Delhi to collect support for full state
Kapoor said the ruling directed for more cooperation between the LG and the municipal cabinet and that all concerned must respect the verdict.
The rights of elected governments can not be usurped, say the left parties
Welcoming the verdict of the Supreme Court Interfering with the political decisions of the AAP government, the leftist parties said Wednesday that the ruling has once again shown that the rights of elected governments could not be usurped .
Secretary General of PCI (M) Sitaram Yechury the verdict of the Supreme Court had led to the misuse of power by local authorities and governors to focus on a specific point.
"The Role of Governors and Governors and Their Ab They have been highlighted by the judgment of today. The masquerade of BJP's cooperative federalism and, in fact, the destruction of our federal structure is reprehensible. LG / governors can not usurp the rights of an elected state government, "he wrote on Twitter
The role of governors and governors and their misuse were put in place evident by the judgment of today. the reality destroying our federal structure is reprehensible, governors / governors can not usurp the rights of an elected state government.) https://t.co/MBHAAA4kBg
– Sitaram Yechury (@SitaramYechury) 4 July 2018
The IPA echoed the sentiment and said the verdict was applicable to all states.
"We welcome the SC ruling, which makes it very clear that the elected officials can not be ignored as they represent the people. The LGs and governors are chosen by the president and elected council. that the order is for a particular state, it is applicable to all the LGs and the governors. "The parties of the left protested for a long time against the rulers who undermined the rights of the elected governments in various states.
SC ruling not a justification for AAP, says Sheila Dikshit
The former chief minister of Delhi, Sheila Dikshit, said Wednesday that the decision of the AAP d & # 39; to be bound by the advice of the government was "not a justification" for the party because "he always Dikshit, who was the chief minister of Delhi from 1998 to 2013, said that his government had -be divergent with the local government, but that there was never any "conflict."
When the differences emerged, after talking to each other, we settled these differences "Dikshit told the PTI news agency after the decision.
[ad_2]
Source link
