[ad_1]
The United States promised to send the first humans to Mars by the 2030s, but space experts and lawmakers have expressed concern that planning and enforcement lack of funds is delaying these plans.
to send Americans back to the moon for the first time since the 1960s and 1970s Apollo missions, building a lunar bridge to test the technology and spacecraft that will transport humans to Mars.
At a hearing in Washington, Sen. Bill Nelson stated that the White House's decision to return to the moon – a program that former President Barack Obama has halted to focus on Mars – could slow down the whole process
"We do not want to steal NASA's budget from what is the goal is to reach Mars with humans
," said Nelson, a Democrat of Florida, home to Cape Canaveral and Kennedy Space Center
"Do these missions help us to reach our goal: to bring humans to Mar In 1965, an independent group of experts known as the Augustine Commission warned that NASA's resources did not meet its high targets.
With an annual budget of about $ 18 billion, NASA would need an additional $ 3. According to NASA officials, year they try to develop an in-depth space program with much less, using only budget increases based on inflation
. And National Academies of Science have calculated that if NASA's budget continued on its current trajectory, "forget the scenario of arriving at Mars in the 2030s". It would take us until 2050. "I do not think we wanted to wait that long."
The Global Partners Concerned
In 2017, NASA's NASA Congress authorization bill needed to define and deliver to Congress a step-by-step plan to reach Mars.
"We have not got that roadmap yet, it's seven months late," Nelson said.
"What gives? Let's see the program to go to Mars and see where all this is."
Testifying at the hearing, Chris Carberry, executive director of Mars, said international and private partnerships could help the United States make more affordable
"Our international partners want us to lead," he told legislators
"But they have worries that we will continue to change direction. They are not sure that we will follow the direction. "
More so, aerospace experts have identified a dozen technologies that" we need to start working pretty much immediately if we have the hope of landing on Mars in the years 2030. "Carberry added.
These include the development of spaceships that can survive the difficult entry on Mars and land softly, as well as the ability to lift people and return to Earth. A long time to achieve this, Carberry said, praising bipartisan support for NASA, he sees among legislators, Texas Sen. Ted Cruz, a Republican who heads the Senate Subcommittee on Human Rights. space, said he hopes NASA's next funding bill "This next NASA clearance, the hope is that it will go further and be more daring in his aspirations, "he said.
Cruz asked dice at NASA's retired astronaut Peggy Whitson, who has spent an American record of 665 days in space, for her view on what is needed for the future.
"The most important thing is the constancy of purpose," she replied.
"We must have a vision that lasts more than one administration.We must have a budget line that will support those goals and objectives that we are trying to achieve."
(This story was published from a thread of the wire agency without changes to the text. changed.)
Source link
