[ad_1]
Do to others what you would like them to do is an expression that the former chairman of the Central Film Certification Board (CBFC) will currently identify. Ironically, Nihalani moved Monday the holiday bench of the High Court of Bombay to challenge the notification of the film that offered him twenty cuts for his film that was to appear soon, " Rangeela Raja & # 39 ;. During his tenure as head of the board of directors, Nihalani had earned a reputation for requiring numerous cuts in several films, including " Udta Punjab & # 39; , who had asked 89 changes on various issues.
The latest issue of Nihalani – which he produces and directs at the same time – plays a leading role in Govinda. The plea filed by Nihalani, through the attorney Ashok Sarogi, asks the council to cancel and rescind his opinion and to authorize the broadcast of the film without the suggested cuts. Some of the suggested reductions include the deletion of lines such as " Main toh Ram Nahin ban saka .. Aapse aasha a 1965 rakhta tha ke Sita banoge … woh bhi from 1965 to hua "(I could not be Ram, but hoped you would be Sita, that did not happen) and" Arjun ki tarah raat [19659003] kb kyun teer chala rahe ho "(Like Arjun, why do you shoot arrows in the night?) [19659002] In defending his film, he says that the guidelines dictate that an opinion may be challenged before the review panel, the court or the court. "I decided to challenge it in court, as was done in the case of the film Udta Punjab ." He added that it was not a "vulgar" film and that the board of directors was certifying other "much more vulgar and obscene" films.
Dilemma of the director
The suggested reductions include: " Main toh Ram nahin ban saka..Aapse aasha rakhta tha Sita banoge … woh bhi nahin hua " And " Arjun ki Tarah raat ko kyun teer chala rahe ho ".
Source link
