[ad_1]
In the aftermath of the controversial dissolution of Parliament, Sri Lankan President Maithripala Sirisena, parties opposed to the decision are preparing for a very ambitious legal battle.
On Saturday, the major parties decided to dismiss the Supreme Court earlier this week, challenging Mr. Sirisena's decision that they were violating the Constitution.
The unified National Party (UNP) of the deposed Prime Minister, Ranil Wickremesinghe, and their coalition partners will be a legal challenge, according to their members.
The Muslim Congress of Sri Lanka (SLMC), which is part of the UNP-led front, is considering an independent judiciary action of the coalition. The member said.
The Congress of All Ceylon Makkal (ACMC) is also preparing to petition the Supreme Court on Monday. "This is not because we fear the elections, but because we believe that the actions of the president are completely unconstitutional and contrary to democratic values," said Rishad Bathiudeen, leader of the ACMC, The Hindu .
In addition, the Tamil National Alliance (TNA)) and Janatha Vimukthi Peramuna (JVP), who was part of the dissolved opposition in the House, are preparing to petition the Supreme Court on Monday.
"The Statute is violated"
TNA will seek an interim Order suspending the President's proclamation on the dissolution of Parliament and the calling of general elections, party sources said.
Addressing The Hindu on Saturday, opposition leader and veteran of the TNA, R. Sampanthan, announced this action. taken by the executive Friday "violated" the Constitution.
"I do not think it can be constitutionally supported," Sampanthan said.
"It was a follow-up action by the executive Previous actions – dismissal of the Prime Minister, appointment of a new Prime Minister and prorogation of Parliament None of these can be constitutionally supported "said Mr. Sampanthan.
The Speaker's decision to dissolve Parliament, he said, was about the "inability" of the "new Prime Minister" to show a majority in the House. "It was meant to serve a collateral and subsequent goal," he added.
While President Sirisena's decision is challenged before the law, newly-sworn Prime Minister Mahinda Rajapaksa and his supporters have welcomed early elections that will establish "the will of the people".
Bimal Rathnayake, national and parliamentary organizer of the JVP, told The Hindu that, even though the party was preparing for elections since last year, "we did not no need of any election.We need free and fair elections.In the present circumstances, this is excluded. "
President Sirisena" violated the Constitution in broad daylight ", stated that the Sirisena-Rajapaksa camp wished to go to the polls "only to legitimize its illegal and recent movements". Appointments to the new cabinet. "The TNA also stated that it recognized the democratic spirit of the elections, but it questioned the validity of the polls organized as a result of" unconstitutional "movements.
" Say that They organize elections and get a result that is contrary to them. "" How can we be sure that they will no longer dissolve Parliament? "Asked the legislator and lead counsel for the TNA, MA Sumanthiran.
Role of the Voting Panel
All eyes were on the Electoral Commission on Saturday, to see if the scrutiny mechanism of the polls independently seek the Supreme Court's opinion on the issue. As a result of a meeting of its three commissioners, sources told The Hindu that one of them was of the opinion that it was "There was no vacancy in Parliament" and, therefore, the conduct of the vote was not an issue.
The other two, however, stressed the need to follow the notification of the President's Gazette and asked the Commissioner-General to begin the preparatory work for the scheduled polls. Soliciting the opinion of the court, a source close to the discussion said: "The Commission will give its opinion if it is designated as party [by any other petitioner].
[ad_2]
Source link
