[ad_1]
The Supreme Court hardly expressed the urgency of solving the problem of Babri Masjid-Ram temple in Ayodhya, the patience of many leading players slowly erupted. On Sunday, the statement of Rashtriya leader Swayamsevak Sangh (RSS), Mohan Bhagwat, calling for the removal of the old English saying "justice is delayed, justice is denied" in textbooks shows growing frustration. In fact, the case has been too long postponed.
Image of the head of the RSS feeds file Mohan Bhagwat. PTI
Bhagwat did not hide his resentment of the Supreme Court's decision to postpone the case until January, when a new court will take over and set a new court date. Earlier this month, the Supreme Court refused to give the case an urgent hearing, as desired by many people badociated with Hindutva forces. The source of the Sangh Parivar, by his words and his action, made it clear that after being silent for four years under the regime of Narendra Modi, he would aggressively mobilize his support for Ram's temple.
Bhagwat also requested the intervention of the government Narendra Modi and a law for the construction of a Ram temple, knowing full well that the Center is not quite willing to use the way Legislative, although there remains only a plenary working session in front of the country before the elections in Lok Sabha. year. Although the HSS and the Center are both committed to solving this problem, they are not quite on the same track with regard to strategy.
On one previous occasion, the head of the RSS had indicated that he was open to the views of various problems, especially if it comes from the BJP that now governs the country. In this context, his statement that "sometimes such pressures (pressure from people to adopt legislation to create a Ram temple) can give weight to the government" is fraught with connotations.
The pressure he was referring to was observed at Monday's rally in Ayodhya, where thousands of the seers took a call from the RSS and Vishwa Hindu Parishad to decide on a timetable for the construction of a large Ram temple on the contentious site of Ramjanabhoomi. On Monday, Prime Minister Narendra Modi, who also rarely spoke on the Ayodhya issue, also criticized Congress for playing a "dangerous game" to delay in a way or to other the hearing before the Supreme Court. It is hard to believe that this is a mere coincidence if the Chief Minister of Uttar Pradesh, Yogi Adityanath, also officially released the details of the 211-meter-high Ram status that he has in mind. 39; intention to develop on the banks of the Saryu River in Ayodhya.
The last time Modi talked about Ayodhya was about a year ago. On December 7, 2017, while campaigning in Kalol, Gujarat, Modi aggressively took the problem by hand. The Prime Minister, however, had not addressed the issue since the election campaign in Gujarat last December. He addressed the issue Sunday while campaigning in Rajasthan.
Modi criticized congressional leaders for asking questions about his caste, for dragging his mother into the election speech and asking her who his father was before moving on to the Ayodhya issue. how Congress played a "dangerous game" to delay the court hearing.
The former Union Minister, congressional deputy and senior attorney of a Muslim organization Kapil Sibal, had argued before the Supreme Court that the hearing on Ram's temple was postponed to July 15, 2019. This request was to ensure that the hearing occurs after the next government badumes that the issue has political ramifications. Others went so far as to claim that the agenda was "in a hurry" to hear the case, which had been pending for seven years.
The political heat that reigned around the issue was such that Sibal withdrew from his legal duties. But there was a sustained campaign of word of mouth against the then chief justice, Deepak Misra, who wanted to give a verdict on Ram's temple before retiring and where the opposition was relying on the fact that the Chief Justice wanted a quick hearing the case. It is also a fact that Sibal was the architect of the congressional decision to file a motion for dismissal against Judge Misra.
Congress leader, CP Joshi, had questioned the caste of Modi and Uma Bharti and declared that only Brahmins had the right to speak of the Hindu. religion. The pawn of the Prime Minister arrived one day when a large number of sadhus had gathered in Ayodhya. It is a fact that the sadhus come from various castes and that the declaration of Modi would please them.
Modi's badertion was that these leaders did not speak alone but spoke at the invitation of "namdar" (Congressman Rahul Gandhi) [19659005] Officially, the Ram Temple was not on the agenda of the BJP during this round of the Assembly election in the five states, but an emerging narrative around Ayodhya could leave traces in a part of the voters Hindus.
[ad_2]
Source link
