[ad_1]
Alok Verma appealed to the highest court against the government's decision to deprive him of his powers.
IWC Director in Exile, Alok Verma, stated that he could be removed from office only with the agreement of a group Special himself, the Supreme Court today heard his petition against the authorization of forced exit.
The government's decree removing it from any charge was baseless, said his lawyer, Fali Nariman, before the highest courts, adding that a "government order could not be maintained without permission. of the committee ".
The director of the CBI was appointed on February 1, 2017 and "by law, there will be a two-year term and that gentleman can not even be transferred," Nariman told the court.
Judge KM Joseph asked, "What if the head of the IWC is caught in the act of corruption?" Mr. Nariman replied, "The center should appear in court or go to the committee."
Attorney General KK Venugopal, who was appearing for the center, told the court that the government was the ultimate authority in the appointment of the director of the IWC. "There is a significant difference between the selection of a candidate and the nomination of a candidate (…). After selection, the committee loses control of the nominee and it is not So there is no question of the committee being called again for a transfer, "Venugopal said. [19659004] He also told the court that Alok Verma "still had the status of director and enjoyed all the privileges and benefits of the position to date", and there was no indication that he had been transferred.
The highest court adjourned the hearing on December 5.
The Supreme Court refused to seize the case at the previous hearing on November 20, furious for leaks of information to the media.
The case is focused on corruption. The charges were exchanged by two officials of the country's highest investigative agency, Alok Verma and his deputy, Rakesh Asthana.
"None of you deserve a hearing," said the Supreme Court, reporting in a report in a newspaper. sealed pouch.
Alok Verma appealed to the Supreme Court against the government's decision to strip him of his powers and send him on compulsory leave. The Central Vigilance Commission presented to the court its report on the corruption charges against him.
The Supreme Court stated that the head of the IWC had not been kept clear in the vigilance report. The report is "laudatory for some charges, not very laudatory for some charges and very uncomplicated for some charges," the court told Verma.
The director of the CBI was accused by his deputy Rakesh Asthana of being bribed by a Hyderabad – based businessman on whom the agency is investigating. Mr. Verma accused Mr. Asthana of the same crime.
As the main accused of corruption, they were both sent on leave and several agents investigating Mr. Asthana were transferred on the night of 23 October.
[ad_2]
Source link
