[ad_1]
The article claimed that Ajit Doval's son, Vivek Doval, was running a hedge fund.
Vivek Doval, son of National Security Advisor (NSA) Ajit Doval, on Monday filed a defamation complaint against an information magazine for allegedly publishing a defamatory article.
In addition to the magazine and the author of the article, Kaushal Shroff, Vivek also filed a complaint against Congress leader Jairam Ramesh for holding a press conference on Jan. 17, reiterating the " without foundation and without foundation ". the facts "as recounted in the article.
The article baderted that Vivek ran a hedge fund whose promoters had dubious background.
He claimed that the magazine" deliberately malignant and defamed him "to" settle his accounts with his father. "
The Caravan, in its January 16 online newspaper titled" D Corporations, "had stated that Vivek," runs a hedge fund in the Cayman Islands "which is "an established tax haven" and that was "recorded only 13 days after the government of Prime Minister Narendra Modi demonetized all existing banknotes of 500 and 1,000 rupees in 2016."
Additional Metropolitan Mayor Samar Vishal will likely hear the case on Tuesday.
Vivek alleged that the content of the article did not present "any illegality" on his part, but the entire narrative was presented in such a way as to Suger er "wrongdoing" to readers.
"The very layout of the paragraphs and the intersection of random paragraphs, was done for the sole purpose of blurring the reader and letting him believe that there is a larger plot at stake, led by the complainant, "says the complaint.
The media tweets circulated by the magazine provided excerpts from the article, which clearly show that it is only a targeted attempt to tarnish and tarnish the reputation of Vivek and his family, with the aim of gaining "political credit". "The title of the article itself is scandalous to say the least … create prejudice in the minds of readers against the complainant and his family," the complaint said.
She added that a questionnaire had been sent to Vivek and her older brother on a social networking site, looking for details, while vaguely mentioning that it was about the same. an article written by the magazine.
"It is relevant to mention that this questionnaire was not accessible and that it suddenly disappeared from the complainant's Facebook messenger." According to the information provided by the complainant, the complainant's older brother did not had access to his email only after the publication of the article on January 16 and the press conference of January 17, "the complaint says.
He further alleged that there was no phone. appeal asking for clarification from him or his older brother, which clearly indicates that the questionnaire was a "simple washing of the eye to complete the procedure" in defense of any criminal action, the accused knowing that the " imputations are in themselves defamatory and false ".
With respect to Ramesh, the complaint indicated that the press conference he had addressed went "beyond mere narrative in the article" and that it was already prepared and armed to launch an attack ", in the expectation of the publication of the article", which could then serve as "smoke curtain to the deliberately targeted and deliberate attack on the reputation of the complainant and of his family ".
It was said that the article had been used for political purposes. An essential tool to "encourage unscrupulous hands" to "seek revenge and revenge".
The complaint also states that the author of the article claimed to have had access to numerous documents and that there is "crucial information allegedly claimed." not to be accessible to the author. "
" The true facts, that is, the history and background of the complainant and his companies, which were sufficiently detailed, sufficient evidence that the author deliberately and selectively allowed certain essential information to be inaccessible, which would have the effect of highlighting the legality and desirability of the complainant's commercial activity ",
He also stated that the very fact of creating and launching a hedge fund, whether in the Cayman Islands or elsewhere in the world, is not in itself an illegal and illegal act.
"However, the same, even without saying so explicitly, described it so that the creation and launching of the hedge fund would be perceived as an illegal act," he said.
The complaint alleged that a "network of conjecture es and badumptions had been designed selectively and cautiously. " Random selection of random facts about the applicant, his brother and father – the facts having no connection one with the other – and presenting them in ways that suggest deep-rooted plots between family members in black money laundering, by diverting funds back to India through the Cayman Islands, in the post-demonetization era. "
He added:" Although there can be no explicit allegation so made, several questions to that effect have raised, insinuating and imputing such wrongdoing, thus leaving to the public a certain negative perception of the actions of the complainant and members of his family, a perception that was Anticipated and calculated reaction The questions, insinuations and imputations were specifically aimed at "
(With the exception of the title, this story was not edited by the staff of NDTV and is published from a syndicated thread.)
[ad_2]
Source link
