20 Ways to Improve the Current WWE Television Product



[ad_1]

  20 Ways to Enhance WWE's Current TV Product "title =" 20 Ways to Enhance WWE's Current TV Product "/> </div>
<p>  Before I Begin, I'd Like say this: I've never written any TV shows, especially one. <em> literally </em> never ends .I do not know how to organize a wrestling show, write an interesting dialogue or create captivating scenarios. </p>
<p>  But I have a good idea of ​​what I personally like and what I think it works well and I've compiled a (quite lengthy) list of changes that I would like to see implemented in the WWE's flagship programs (Raw and SmackDown Live), as well as some thoughts on the NXT product. </p>
<p>  WWE currently broadcasts an average of at least 8 hours of television per week, split into 5 different shows (Raw, SmackDown Live, Live 205, NXT UK and NXT). hours, I usually enjoy about 5 hours and I would never say 5 hours A week of good to big TV is not impressive. </p>
<p>  That being said, the most watched WWE show, <em> Monday Night Raw </em> is often part of the approximately 3 hours I <em> did not like. Starting the week with a stinker also brings many fans to quit the fight for the week, which means that shows that are often good (SmackDown Live, for example) are completely ignored. </p>
<p>  The Raw Raws, as well as an outdated format That goes back legitimately to several decades and has led to a decline in ratings and supporters in search of change. </p>
<p>  At this point, I think that a change is not only necessary, but that it must be quite radical. Everything from the appearance and user-friendliness of the products, through the list processing, up to the range of televisions itself, must be completely reorganized. </p>
<p>  A substantial change in the way WWE does things would have enough press to lead many things. old (and new) eyes returning to their product. And if it's good, who knows, maybe they'll stay for a while. </p>
<p>  Now, I really believe that the biggest problem of WWE is simply that they have too much content to produce, which leads the talents (and their creative team) to use it. out and overexposed. But it's a business, and all that content is its biggest source of revenue, so I'll try to make it work in that format. </p>
<p>  Here is a list of 20 things I would like to change about today's WWE product, including its weekly TV format, how they pay for the card and even how they handle it. their list. </p>
<h5 style= 1. Creating a Darker and More Sordering Television Product

One thing that comes into my head when I look at a product today is that … brilliant everything looks. When you watch older episodes of Raw, before the WWE switched to HD in 2008, the situation was much darker and more granular, which works well for the fight.

Of course, it is a personal taste, but I do not do it. think the fight is supposed to be so bright and polite. I mean, the fight is a pretty metal deal, people are fighting each other . Today, Raw and SmackDown Live seem much more pop than metal, which just does not work.

For a moment, I thought it was just the price to go to HD. But then, NXT and even UFC showed me that it was possible to play in black and white while maintaining a beautiful appearance in HD.

The lighting of the arena Monday Night Raw compared to that of a NXT TakeOver event.
(WWE.com)

With the production of NXT, the crowd is dimly lit and the color is black, but you can still say that there is a big budget behind the product. In simple terms, the film has a cool appearance and an underground atmosphere, but does not feel like being filmed in the dimly lit basement with a cheap camera.

In fact, because they often fall into the water at night, WWE frequently uses the same layout of the scene for its NXT TakeOver events and its main list of pay-per-views. So, in the same building and using the same equipment, NXT can succeed in getting its signature look without doing anything other than turning off the lights and changing the color of the ring mat. .

The WWE must adopt NXT's production approach and create its shows. feel raw again (no pun intended).

Here is an idea of ​​what an NXT-type set Monday Night Raw would look like.

2. Exit with jolts and cuts in the camera

This one is pretty self-explanatory …

LMAOOOO LOOKS THE CAMERA, Kevin Dunn Must Be Arrested pic.twitter.com/zWAKGI6Iss [19659024] – WrestlinGifs (@WrestlinGifs) March 19, 2019

The WWE camera work is a bit of a problem, and it can sometimes ruin truly awesome moments. It is absolutely pointless to shake the camera violently and move on to another shot just before the impact of each move.

The WWE's lineup is talented enough to present as clean as punchy matches, without giving spectators the same movement as ever. disease.

3. Other minor changes to the presentation

  • Reactivate the first video for Raw and SmackDown Live
  • Reactivate pyro for PPV (or all shows, regardless of budget)
  • Create custom sets for all stadium shows (Royal Rumble, SummerSlam, etc.)
4. A complete overhaul of how promos are made

As I said earlier, the WWE TV show has been presented in the same way for decades. The average episode of Raw is this one for as long as I can remember:

  • A 15-minute promo that organizes the first match or the main event
  • The match itself (in the next segment , ie at the end of the series)

I think it's time to abandon this formula for good and, in fact, reduce the number of promos in the ring from one side to the other.

This does not mean that the WWE should stop talking completely; they have an abundance of talented people who can fend for themselves at the microphone. Some people may need more scripts than others, but there is a solid group of speakers who can sell matches and quarrels by captivating the audience with their words.

The problem is that the 15-minute promo in the ring and behind-the-scenes interview have both grown, and the format often hurts talent more than it helps them.

My idea? Reduce the number of traditional backstage and behind-the-scenes promotions and replace the majority of them with highly-produced video packages, such as those already found on the WWE YouTube channel and on the Internet. WWE network.

They are already creating this style of content, and I would add that they just need to show more on TV.

This Samoa Joe "Day Of" Special is the kind of thing WWE should show on TV.

In my opinion, only a few segments should last more than a few minutes, which works perfectly with this format. In addition, aesthetically speaking, they integrate well with the desired mood of the show graittier and feel fresh and exciting.

WWE tries to tell fascinating stories, and people's words will always be an integral part of this narrative process. Combining these video packages with elements such as Bray Wyat's Firefly Fun House will help refresh things and give a declining TV product a much needed boost.

5. Be more creative with Bumpers

Lately, WWE has been able to better publicize the segment of post-trade breaks to prevent viewers from changing channels.

Their main strategy is to show the person at the next match or segment entering before the break.

It works, but can be a little repetitive after a while, and also lets a poor soul stand awkwardly in the ring for several minutes. It is good to use it from time to time, but there are other ways to use bumpers that can influence the next segment and keep the audience interested enough to withstand the commercial break.

For example:

You will probably need more video. Producers need to realize this heavy product in video packages because of the high demand, but you will also need fewer writers for things to balance.

6. Mix The Match Lengths

The WWE product in the ring has never been better.

The number of top-notch matches in recent years has been surprisingly high and, from a pure wrestling standpoint, WWE's alignment is also impressive.

If there is one thing I would like to see change in the WWE product in the ring, it's a greater variety in the length of the matches, especially on television .

Of course, a complete show The squash matches of one minute are going to be boring.

But if each show includes:

  • one or two short squash matches
  • one or two five-minute sprints (NXT does this style of match)
  • And then one or two competitive matches of 10 minutes

I think you will have more stars and weekly TV shows that circulate better.

Dominik Dijakovic vs. Keith Lee of an episode of NXT is the kind of "5 minute sprint" that I would like to see more often on Monday and Tuesday nights.

Squash matches are needed for talent creation as dominant forces . The 5-minute sprints are a great way to have two shorter, entertaining games at every show. And again, few things in the series should last more than 5 to 8 minutes, but you have a PPV quality match on each show to satisfy a certain group of fans.

7. Speed ​​Things Up

SmackDown Live and NXT move quite quickly from one segment to the other, giving the shows an exciting and must-see feel. Raw, on the other hand, has a lot more time to fill and, as a result, the show can often slip.

The segments must follow one another quickly, the time necessary for the spectator to then breathe ] between them. If properly executed, this strategy allows you to run a show a little faster and get more people on TV, which is always a good thing.

Take a look at the whole map

About getting more people on TV …

It's a pretty obvious statement, but WWE is at its best when all their divisions are flourishing. When the tag division, the middle card scene, the women's division and the main stage are all hot, the show is much more enjoyable and each segment becomes not to be missed .

WWE needs to have multiple segments of each division on each show each week. They have the talent to do it, it just takes a concerted effort from those who designed the series to do it at this point.

Right now, WWE does not have Steve Austin or The Rock bringing people in and out of their doors every week. It's a team effort and the WWE product will only be as strong as its weakest links.

9. Leaving the Arena Plus

If there is one thing that the WWE should report from the era of attitude these are segments that take place outside of l & # 39; arena.

WWE has interesting characters that could very well be drawn from it. kind of environment. And if you think about it, some of the most memorable segments of the WWE of all time have not happened inside a ring or even inside an arena. .

I want to talk about fans and again talk about DX's tank invasion and Stone Cold's attack by Booker T in the grocery store.

10. Plan ahead and advertise heavily

It is well known that WWE too often makes last-minute changes to their scripts. It's perhaps easier said than done, but if they manage to flesh out two or three segments about five days before the next show, they'll have some things to plug into on social media (and television) to spark their interest. [19659003] In simple terms, by Wednesday, I should have two or three big segments to get excited about the next Monday of Raw

11. Bring back special episodes of Raw and SmackDown Live

Do you remember those Raw Roulette that WWE was in the habit of doing? The "spin the wheel" scenario often gave the impression of an episode of Raw as a pay-per-view and created a show, at least for a week, that you could not miss.

The WWE is expected to bring back Raw Roulette Old-School Raw and other thematic episodes from their weekly television shows more often to spark interest and spark the day. interest, potentially bringing back some older and more casual fans into the process.

12. End each broadcast with a bang

Again, it's easier said than done, but when a show ends with a hot segment, it's really fun to do it. ;to be fan.

Social media is in turmoil and fans can not wait to see what happens next. In fact, a hot ending can often turn an average episode of Raw into a big one.

WWE weekly TV shows often end in a rather anti-climax manner, the winner of the main event celebrating a meaningless victory in the ring the copyright logo appears in the corner lower left of the screen.

However, when WWE does a good job and the show turns off, there's nothing like it.

13. Get rid of most gimmick pay-per-views

At the present time, WWE relies too much on gimmicks to sell pay-per-views. For example, the WWE may use the fact that Hell in a Cell is preparing in two weeks to hold a Hell in a Cell match, instead of creating an interesting bloody conflict that ends

The elimination of these crutches would force WWE to create compelling scenarios to sell its network subscriptions and its a la carte views, instead of just saying, "It's next week, test it!

My ideal 12-month daily digital television program would look something like this:

  • Royal Rumble (January)
  • Fastlane (February)
  • WrestleMania (April)
  • Backlash (May) [19659029] King of the Rings (June) *
  • Battlefield (July)
  • SummerSlam (August)
  • No Way Out (September)
  • Money in the Bank (October) [19659029] Evolution (October)
  • Survivors Series (November)
  • Vengeance (December)

* Note: The concept of "King of the Ring" is great and is a great way to Set up SummerSlam's challengers fill the time spent in front of the television for a few weeks, but the name needs work. There would definitely be a women's tournament, making the KOTR brand obsolete. Someone proposes a name that works and tweet, @TheRumbleRamble .

Shows alternate between "A show, B show", which means a major event and a smaller event. A typical "show" format would look something like this:

  • 10 main card games, 2 pre-show matches
  • from 6:00 pm to 11:00 am EST.
  • A four hour main map, one hour before the show

And the "B-show" format:

  • 8 main chart matches, two matches before the show
  • 7:00 pm to 11:00 pm EST ,
  • A three-hour session Main map, one hour before the broadcast

This would help eliminate some of these 6 and 7 hour pay-per-view events, which often hurt the last half from the menu. I'm very much in favor of getting as many people on TV as possible, but sometimes it's too much.

14. Do not touch the TakeOver NXT format

The TakeOver NXT format should remain the same.

NXT Take-Over Weekends:

  • Royal Rumble (January)
  • WrestleMania (April)
  • KOTR (June))
  • Survivor Series (November)

15. Bring Down the Directors General

The WWE has got rid of the general directors of Raw and SmackDown Live and really needs to bring them back. Some things I would like to see in the current GM:

  • No heels (we have seen enough)
  • No active wrestlers
  • Model all GM after Paige, Drake Maverick and NXT. William Regal
16. Forced Application of Brand Sharing

The WWE has been a bit odd since the mark was split and people are popping up everywhere. This kind of ruins Royal Rumble and Survivor Series, announced as the only two nights where brands should engage each other.

I would put an end to this and leave these two nights, as well as the WrestleMania battle royals, as the only interaction between Raw and SmackDown Live each year.

17. Replace the superstar's shake-up with a commercial season

Once the general managers are back, the WWE should replace the superstar shake-up with a sport-like commercial season. The compositional moves are exciting and necessary to create new quarrels and fights, but the current format leaves something to be desired and leaves much to be desired.

Regarding the trading season, I would have it to start the night after WrestleMania and finish the week of the Survivor series. This gives the WWE nearly 8 months to make the alignment changes but locks them for the WrestleMania season.

You can also imagine that Raw or SmackDown make a last-minute exchange of the Survivor Series week to tip the scales in favor of their brand? This story is written alone!

18. Use mini-feuds to keep the leaflets cool

Mini-quarrels are essential to create a captivating weekly television without spoiling your big pay-per-view games on free television .

A fine example of this in 2002, when The Undertaker was in conflict with Jeff Hardy for a few weeks on Raw and with Brock Lesnar in SmackDown Live (and eventually in pay-per-view). This quarrel gave Taker something exciting to do on television every week, separating him from Lesnar and giving a much needed spotlight to young Jeff Hardy.

Everyone won and we got a clbadic clbadic of all time. match between Hardy and Taker on Raw, which made this episode special to see. More mini-quarrels could be beneficial for people like Chad Gable and Ember Moon, two extremely talented people who have struggled to find their place on television.

19. Bring the factions back

From the nation of domination to the undisputed era, some of the most important and best acts in WWE history have been the factions. In simple terms, factions reign, and WWE should bring them back to the fore.

Most of the time, factions have always worked well and are a fun and creative way to get more people on TV regularly. The War of Factions also helps to make the weekly television product more interesting, which is the general purpose here.

20. Just for Fun: An Ideal Television Programming

Finally, here is what WWE Weekly TV programming would look like if I called the shots. Again, one of the biggest problems with WWE is that they just have too much content, but it's money and it's not going to go away anytime soon.

I have tried to make the most of the situation by using all this time to create (hopefully) an exciting range. The composition looks like this:

  • WWE Raw (Monday on the USA Network)
  • In-Studio Show (Tuesday on Fox Sports 1)
  • NXT and NXT UK (Wednesday on the WWE Network)
  • All All Show (WWE Network Thursday) *
  • SmackDown Live (Friday on Fox)

* Note: I would replace 205 Live with an all-female parade. You can record matches before and after Raw and SmackDown Live, using the talents of each brand.

[ad_2]
Source link