[ad_1]
Archie Harrison Mountbatten-Windsor may have arrived, but some are already wondering if the couple intends to expand their family even more, especially if Meghan Markle and Prince Harry would ever adopt children. I mean, yes, they absolutely need time to learn to become the parent of the child they already have before they want to start thinking about integrating another into the family; people are still wondering, though. Such is the life of widely visible personalities.
Questions as to whether Meghan and Harry and Kate Middleton and Prince William might consider that the adoption has turned out almost as long as the two couples are together. – and to be honest, it's a bit weird. People's decision to expand their families and, if they choose to do so, what they are planning to do, are not really a matter of anything else, so the monitoring of these four people was she always seemed a little strange and intrusive. It is true that they are public figures and that all the children that they decide or not to raise are part of the monarchy. So I can sort from to understand why these extremely personal questions might be relevant to the general public; As a general rule, I would say we should leave ourselves pretty well. The palace always makes all the announcements that it thinks the public must hear when it has determined that it was appropriate and prudent to do so, so let's take a look at this.
Pool / Getty Images Hobbies / Getty Images
It is a little interesting, however, to wonder if the same Royals can adopt . The answer to this question seems to be positive: according to an anonymous source from the palace who spoke on the Best Life lifestyle website in 2018, there is no law preventing members of the British royal family from adopting. No member of the British Royal Family ever adopted, but nothing prevents any of them from doing so if they wish, legally. In the course of history, other royal families have adopted: King Charles XIII of Sweden, for example, without children, adopted twice in 1810 – Charles August and Jean-Baptiste Bernadotte – in order to constitute a successor to the throne; Meanwhile, King Hussein of Jordan and Queen Alia adopted Abir Muhaisen in 1976, following the death of his parents in a plane crash.
Ideologically, the adoption looks like something like Meghan and Harry – and probably the royal family. more generally – would support, depending on their charitable work. Between 2016 and 2017, Meghan was a global ambbadador for World Vision, the world's largest international charity for children. The charitable organization that Meghan, Harry, Kate Middleton and Prince William badociate with, namely the Royal Foundation of the Duke and Duchess of Cambridge and the Duke and Duchess of Susbad, includes among its many areas of targeted programs to young people. And together, various members of the royal family are the bosses of more than 200 organizations dedicated to supporting children and youth.
Pool / Getty Images Entertainment / Getty Images
However, it should be noted that if Meghan and Harry – or any other member of the royal family – have chosen to adopt, their foster child may is not eligible for the line of succession. According to the Act of Regulation of 1701, the heirs to the throne must be the Protestant heirs of Princess Sophia, a Hanoverian voter and granddaughter of James I. The law was created to solve a problem; Queen Anne having no heirs, the decision was made to pbad the thread to Sophia, her cousin. Sophia herself never took the throne – she died before Queen Anne. Be that as it may, the line of succession was secured when Sophia's son, George, elector of Hanover, was crowned in 1714 and became King George I.
The Colonization Act also established place some other stipulations; the sovereign, for example, had to be in communion with the Anglican Church. Catholics could not hold the crown; no one could marry with a Roman Catholic. Just FYI.
Whatever the case may be, Marlene A. Eilers Koenig, one of the foremost experts on British and European royalties, explained to Cosmopolitan in 2018 that the act of succession is not 39 applied only to the heirs of blood. "Adopted children would not have inheritance or title rights. To have inheritance rights, you must be a Protestant descendant of the Sophia Electrice, "said Koenig. "This excludes adopted children."
Chris Jackson / Chris Jackson Collection / Getty Images
The question of whether the eligibility of the adoptee to the line of succession mattered to parents is a separate issue – it can not, after all – but would probably still be something that any royal thought about adoption would take into consideration during its decision-making process.
Of course, the rules can be changed; indeed, the rules have been modified before, and quite recently. In 2011, the prime ministers of the 16 Commonwealth countries, including the United Kingdom, came together to create the Perth Accord, which brought a number of notable changes to the treatment of the estate in the British monarchy : he eliminated primogeniture preferably – that is, eliminated the rule that male offspring took precedence over female offspring in the line of succession – and overruled the rule of marrying with a Roman Catholic you were excluded from the line of succession. (However, it is not that lifted the ban that prevents non-Protestants from being crowned, and the ruler must always be in communion with the Church. to maintain his position.)
WPA Pool / Getty Images Entertainment / Getty Images
The Perth Accord has been formally enacted in the UK with the pbadage of the law of 2013 on the estate, which came into effect in 2015. You may remember the hubbub that raged in 2017 The family announces that Kate Middleton was pregnant with her and the third child of Prince William; it meant that, even if the child was a boy, Charlotte would still be directly behind her older brother, Prince George, in the line of succession. Previously, it would have been ruled out when Prince Louis was finally born in 2018. But that was not the case thanks to the new law and, to be honest, it is quite radical.
I say everything. this in order to clarify that even though the law in force states that a child adopted by members of the Royal Family is not eligible for the line of succession, it will not be necessarily always the case. If the members of the royal family had chosen to adopt Parliament could choose to change the rules again.
Would Meghan and Harry have been adopted? It belongs to them. I am sure, however, that if they or any other member of the royal family wished, we will hear about it if and when the palace is ready to tell us.
Source link
