Indignation provoked by Game of Thrones: Transformer Daenerys into "Mad Queen" proves we love "benign" dictators

I hated the writers of Game of Thrones for forcing Daenerys Targaryen to do things that she was threatening to do all those years. I belonged to the naive group who believed that Dany would not go like a crazy king. I always knew she was not a woman of liberal-democratic values, but I felt that she was the benevolent dictation we deserved. His relapse into total madness has left many fans clueless and downcast because we tend to occasionally dismiss benevolent dictators thinking that they would turn out to be different, they would destroy and replace the old elite but would be beneficial for the society the hungry mbades.

Whatever may be, let's get out of politics and see what happens in Dany's subjective world from the psychobadytic point of view.

She suppressed her desire to blow up towns earlier and she effectively ended slavery in slavery towns. So what justifies her total abandonment of her impulses while she is so close to her goal? It must be understood that the slave towns she liberated were not part of her identity, she did not belong to these people. They simply satisfied her need to be seen as a liberator, venerated, elevated in her stature. They were objects outside of his subjective self. Thus, she was able to make rational decisions to prevent them from overcoming her innate impulses and impulses.
<! –

->

But by the time she takes a hard at the Red Keep, something is breaking. The red dungeon is part of her identity and her inner world – a world in which she imagines herself to be the legitimate ruler of the Seven Kingdoms and that people were waiting for her return to be freed from the tyranny of the present rulers.
Unfortunately, it was only in Dany's head. In fact, no one was waiting to welcome him, no one trusted or loved him in Westeros and, worse yet, did not believe in his ability to become an effective leader.

What the contradictory feeling that consumes it calls "cognitive dissonance". This is perhaps the most likely psychic conversation in Dany's mind: "That's where I belong, it's my whole being. But wait, why do not people like me and trust me? To overcome the destruction of her self and this existential crisis, she does what most leaders do – separating the land from the people who inhabit it. As the earth continues to be part of her self, identifying people like others, she is able to unleash violence on them.

Burning Kings Landing, she changed the object of her desire forever, disfigured. made him weak and needy so that she could love him and possess him in his twisted way. She needed King's Landing to be a mess and not a prosperous place to start her reign, because it's the kind of people she's always reigned on: scared, slaves, and needy. This has always been his model of attachment – a mother, a ruler, a chain breaker. That's what's happening in projective identification – you deny the very objectivity of the object you've identified and established a relationship by virtue of the fact that it does part of your self refused.

Another reason we blame the authors is that they did not do it. Does not effectively build his descent into madness. Again, what we forget is that Dany has always denied his violent side of the first season, while exaggerating his image of "mother". Although she was not one, her image was that of "mother" even though it was about dragons. She even punishes her babies by locking them in a tunnel when they attack a child.

While she embraces her feminine side by caring for her baby dragons and her chain breaker, unlike Cersie who likes to portray male dominance, Dany forgets to incorporate the animus. In Jungian badysis, animus is the male side of the woman. She began with the certainty "I am not my father". Only if her basic badumption was, "I could become my father, but I will choose not to do it," she could have been the queen we all imagined.

This was the nugget of advice that Dumbledore had given to Harry Potter – our choices shape who we are and not the thoughts that obscure our minds and create internal conflicts. This is why schooling, learning and formal training are so important. No matter how difficult you are, and if you left a completely disadvantaged place, education and training would remain what you would need once you reach your goal. A good mentor trains you and improves your skills, but also helps you look at life from a philosophical distance and not be absorbed by its vagaries. Without Dumbeldore and his training at Hogwarts, Harry could also have become his own Voldemort. Life's struggles help you set a goal, but formal education and training in governance prepares you for real power. She asked her father Ned Stark, his half-brother Jon Snow, Syrio and Jaqen H'ghar to give him life-long lessons. Although she was trained as a highly skilled badbadin, she retains her humanity because of her education. Dany unfortunately did not have a mentor. Her personal charisma and leadership led her to where she was As for her advisors, we all know how much power they have. In the absence of a mentor, his loss was a fact of life.

For those of us who support Dany, she is not acceptable in this form – the complete care of the darker side or shadow over her ego 's. is alienated. His fans. In Jungian badysis, the shadow is the part of the psyche that remains unconscious and that does not belong to the individual. This is usually a "bad" attribute like baduality or aggression. We loved the badbad queen brandishing dragons as long as she was killing slave guards. But we never wondered if, under the mask of the chain breaker and the forerunner of justice, she had unconsciously fallen in love with burning people. We have never wondered what place the fire-breathing dragons occupy in a just society. The pro-Dany campaign has humanized the dragons. It's almost like humanizing nuclear power in the hands of crazy dictators. As long as the manufacturers made him kill the other odious, we were very happy to see the roasting party. But when the carnage hit the house, all hell broke out.

Dany's livid fans live in such grave denial that we now think it's not the Targaryen but the writers are the main villains in the series. Just look at the hatred of D & D in different online communities to gorate really the intensity of the smear campaign against the duo, of which I am a part. The denial has reached a delirious and delusional level – seven Lakh people have signed a petition for the last season to be redone. Although David Benioff and DB Weiss have given us some of the most spectacular moments on television of all these years. Administrators are more hated than any bad people in the world. But again it follows the usual script. Thus the followers of the dictators rationalize the acts of their leader – by projecting the evil of their leader on an external factor

Finally, let us examine the feminist argument that the character of Dany was undermined to make man on the throne. I think that while destroying a stereotype, this story reinforces another. While celebrating women becoming powerful heads of discourse on important issues of global concern, we should not lose sight of the fact that tyranny is not just a male attribute. In doing so, we would deny the animus in us, we would do again what masculinity did with power – an unbridled surveillance, an extreme control of the human spirit and the destruction of nature. We do not have to bend the head to a tyrant woman just to overcompensate the exploitation of the past

The complaints are true is that the manufacturers are rushing towards the end, but all good things must stop. The show will end as the directors want. It's their story. What the indignation about the penultimate episode revealed about the viewers, is that we hate maybe being roasted, but that we do not mind living under the threat of the fear of being roasted if the one at the bar is charismatic and strives eagerly to do justice. however abstract.