#MenToo: The court refuses to buy the story of a rape after taking a drink



[ad_1]

MUMBAI: A court of court found him incredulous. The story of a 34-year-old plaintiff who accused actress-performer Karan Oberoi of having initially raped her by administering an intoxicant, as well as her accusation of having filmed the act and extorted money. threatening to circulate the video.

Oberoi was arrested on May 5th. On May 17, the Dindoshi appeal court dismissed his bail application, stating that it would not be appropriate to grant bail "at this point".

The order, released on Tuesday, states: "The story about bad through substance abuse is hard to believe because the informant would have left for her house soon after the incident. It is also difficult to believe the story of extortion under intimidation aimed at making the video viral, given the fact that the informant continued to make gifts to the plaintiff from time to time and that WhatsApp's messages testified to their continued cordial relationship. "

Additional Sessions Judge S U Baghele, in an order of seven pages, also notes: "The careful reading of the recorded WhatsApp messages reveals that they were up to talking about conversation in obscene language. We also see that they had developed intimacy. However, no message is said to the extent that the actor had promised to marry him. "The court also took note of" expensive items handed over by the informant to the applicant and his relatives and to the transfer of huge sums by the bank account informant of the plaintiff. "

The judge says, "A prudent person can understand a one-sided love in which one can be ready to abandon everything blindly for someone else. However, the acceptance of valuables and money by another person would lead one to think in a different direction. It can not be expected that the applicant, as a prudent person, will accept them unless the relationship between them is a committed one, and therefore inclined to unite as partners in the relationship. life. "

In addition, the judge stated: "However, from this perspective, this Court has, at first glance, difficulty believing the initial history of rape, namely that badual intercourse has continued, either by expressly or implicitly claiming a marriage intention. , which equates to rape, since the intention seems to be other than to get married since the beginning. "

Oberoi lawyer Dinesh Tiwari claimed that the actor had never promised to marry or engaged and that this intimacy was consensual and that even the FIR did not mention that it had made gifts because it was a solid relationship. He also wondered about the unexplained delay in filing the prior information report. His lawyers stated "that he wanted a serious relationship and that we therefore did not expect an immediate deposit of the FIR". She also "paid and transferred money and fulfilled all her requirements due to a false marriage promise … and obscene messages were exchanged" due to the marriage pledge . "

[ad_2]
Source link