A woman shamed a guest at the wedding for being dressed in a "ridiculously short dress"

With the wedding season in full swing, the Internet is teeming with horror stories, fashionable faux pas and holiday etiquettes. But the recent complaint of a woman regarding the "inappropriate" dress length of a guest at the wedding did not arouse the sympathy of others.

The woman shared a photo of a friend's sister's wedding on "That's it, I'm going to make fun of me" – a closed Facebook group that describes itself as being dedicated to " wedding-worthy marriages [and] related to marriage "- to emphasize what she called an" absurdly short dress "worn by one of the guests.

"You can see up to her underwear," she wrote in her message. "I think it's inappropriate."

Although the original poster indicates that the bride "had a beautiful appearance and [the couple has] a beautiful relationship," she also criticized "the quality, location and composition of the l & # 39; picture in general ".

Commentators of the post have largely seen nothing wrong with the dress

At the time of writing, almost all the comments on the post express a disagreement with the feelings of the original poster.

"This is not an underwear, it's the lining of the dress," commented a Facebook user. "Usually, the dresses with a transparent layer are lined with an inner layer that hides the underwear, skin and body parts of the wearer that the public deems to be indecent." If you had bothered to look at the dress without your judgment glbades for another 3 seconds, you would have noticed. "

" Well, that's a span and a half, I've seen a lot worse in church ", acknowledged someone else.

"I do not see it at all," wrote another speaker. "It's not because her dress is not kneeling, like almost everyone else, that hers is too short."

"Some dresses seem shorter in high heels," pointed out someone else.

"Inopportune? For a wedding in court? I did not know that there was a standard attire for a wedding in court, but whatever," reads in a fifth comment.

More info : 7 things you should never wear at a wedding

Other users have pointed out the fact that other women on the photo seemed to wear such short dresses.

"Of course, let's agree that the picture could have been better but" it can always be better, "wrote one in the comments. "It's ugly and cute, the dress is a bit short but there are some short dresses on this picture if you play this game."

"It's only slightly shorter than teal," added another person. "Whatever it is, it's a wedding in court, it's nice that their friends / relatives, etc. have taken the time to get dressed up." and celebrate their day with them.The outfits look perfectly fine for what was probably something like a lunch or a party in the backyard ceremony. "

Depending on the theme or style of a wedding, the customer may be asked to adhere to a dress code

While in the case of a wedding in court, such as In the previous case, it is likely that there would be no dress code, some extravagant affairs have strict rules regarding what guests should and should not wear.

Before Pia Muehlenbeck, who became a lawyer, married filmmaker Kane Vato in December 2018, the duo hit the headlines asking their guests to wear "natural tones". Photos of the wedding ceremony celebrating party-goers in neutral tones of pink, beige and white.

In September 2018, another set of marriage instructions became viral after the planner sent a list of requests to all guests forbidding party-goers to wear "a full face makeup" or their hair in a style other than "a bob base or ponytail." The email also warned guests that they would not be allowed to party if they did not arrive with a gift. A value of $ 75 or more.

INSIDER contacted marriage experts for comments.