[ad_1]
This is the Cannes season, and that means everyone with an Instagram account is now a fashion critic with a cerebral vision of how women dress for the red carpet. Of course, freedom of expression is an irrefutable right, but the vitriol that some of our celebrities endure is really unreasonable.
The latest to be noticed is Mallika Sherawat. It is she who went boldly where no Indian woman had gone before, making her Cannes debut in a full-bodied choli and a lehenga shaved at the waist. It was in 2005 and Mallika has since become a regular at Cannes. It may not get as much brilliance as the Aishwaryas and Deepikas of the world, but the woman has turned out to look good over the last ten years. This year, Mallika's Cannes wardrobe featured a blue lace dress she wore for an interview. After the images reached the internet, it took scarcely a few hours for fashion detectives to discover that the dress under her beige coat was the same one that she was wearing on the red carpet in 2014. The trolls online can not be held to standardized
Some may say that famous women have an obligation to look good and have a flawless wardrobe because that's a big part of their work and their success – therefore, the criticism is justified. But what do we say when we shame someone for having repeated an outfit?
Having a limited wardrobe is often considered a symptom of limited budget and taste, and it's a test that only women experience. Not only is it incredibly clbady, but also badist. Famous or not, most women feel the pressure of not being a clothing repeater. At the university, most of us have hoarded piles of cheap clothes just to be able to wear something new every day and wardrobes are another challenge. Most men do not face this pressure.
Michelle Obama emphasized the double meaning when she said, "No matter what we do, he (Barack Obama) puts on the same tuxedo. People take pictures of shoes, the bracelet I wear but they did not comment that for eight years, he was wearing the same tuxedo, the same shoes. "
<img id =" ed-img "title =" iDiva_Shaming-Mallika-Sherawat-For-Repeating-An-Outfit_2 "src =" https://im.idiva.com/content/2019/May/idiva_shaming -mallika-sherawat-for-repeating-an-outfit_2.jpg "alt =" iDiva_Shaming-Mallika-Sherawat-For-Repeating-An-Outfit_2 [19659004] Then there is the environmental cost of all this. According to the guardians of the environment, the garment industry is the second largest polluter in the world, after oil. And this obsession with never being seen together contributes to the proliferation of polluted landfills and oceans. . And if she can do it, you too!
window.twttr = (function (d, s, id) { var js, fjs = d.getElementsByTagName (s) [0], t = window.twttr || {}; if (d.getElementById (id)) returns t; js = d.createElement (s); js.id = id; js.src = "https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js"; fjs.parentNode.insertBefore (js, fjs);
t._e = []; t.ready = function (f) { t._e.push (f); };
return t; } (document, "script", "twitter-wjs"));
(function (d, s, id) { var js, fjs = d.getElementsByTagName (s) [0]; if (d.getElementById (id)) return; js = d.createElement (s); js.id = id; js.src = "//connect.facebook.net/en_US/sdk.js#xfbml=1&version=v2.8"; fjs.parentNode.insertBefore (js, fjs); } (document, 'script', 'facebook-jssdk'));
window.fbAsyncInit = function () {
FB.init ({
appId: & # 39; 145715712124164 & # 39;
status: true,
xfbml: true,
version: & # 39; v2.8 & # 39; // or v2.0, v2.1, v2.2, v2.3
});
};
[ad_2]
Source link