Plagiarism line: Kamal Kant Chandra files a complaint to the police after the coup of sending the team 'Bala & # 39; | Hindi movie news



[ad_1]

Kamal Kant Chandra, badistant director and aspiring filmmaker, filed a complaint under Articles 420 (cheating) and 406 (breach of trust) against the main actor (Ayushmann Khurrana) and the officials of the police station of Kashimira to Mira Road. Chandra had filed an action in the Bombay High Court against Ayushmann, director Amar Kaushik and producer Dinesh Vijan, accusing them of having withdrawn the central plot of a bald man prematurely from his project, Wig.

Chandra testified that at the last hearing on April 19, the lawyers representing the trio lied in court, claiming that the film was still in the scriptwriting stage.

In a mid-day report, Chandra was quoted as saying, "It's not good to start shooting before the court renders its verdict." At the last hearing, they announced that 39, they would take the time to develop the scenario.How did they start shooting In 15 days, that means that they gave a misleading picture to the court.I approached the vacation bench there is four days, but they said that I should wait for the next hearing on June 10. But the filmmakers could finish [a chunk of] the film by then argue that since a lot of money is at stake, the court should rule in their favor. "

He also reportedly received messages from Khurrana's Whatsapp dating from 2017, when he had expressed interest in the concept of the film. Chandra said: "I registered my concept with the Screen Writers' Association in 2016, while their script was recorded in 2018."

The same report quotes Ayushmann 's legal team: "What has been communicated to you is a distortion of bad faith, particularly with regard to the April 9th ​​procedure. case is pending, we no longer comment Our scenario is original and we will show it to the court when the issue comes up. "

The report also published Maddock Films' official statement stating, "The court did not award any relief to the plaintiff or issue any order preventing us from suing the film."

[ad_2]
Source link