[ad_1]
Whenever the national media proposes a new victim in the name of # Resistance, you must be aware that you are being lied to.
The latest is Meghan, the Duchess of Susbad. In a recent interview, President Trump said he was unaware that Meghan had spoken negatively about him during the 2016 campaign.
A British tabloid reporter Sun asked Trump on Sunday before his trip to the United Kingdom Uni: to see it? Since she was not very nice during the campaign, I do not know if you saw that. "
Trump, informing Meghan, a native of Los Angeles, reportedly on maternity leave, replied:" I did not know that. No, I hope she's fine. I did not know.
The reporter urged Trump to say, "She said that she would move to Canada if you were elected. In fact, she moved to Britain. "
" It will be fine, "said Trump." A lot of people are settling here, so what can I say? No, I did not know it was nasty. "
It boiled down to: Trump calls the princess "nasty"!
Trump had actually added in the interview that "it's nice" that the UK now has a princess of US origin and that she "will be very good. "
The term "wicked" was used by Trump to replace the initial description given by the reporter to "was not so good."
But you would not know what it was. It is really by taking a look at the media coverage. Washington Post blogger Eugene Scott said that Trump's "attacks" on Meghan were "familiar and unsurprising" because his use of the word "wicked" reinforced the belief that Trump "is badist and misogynist." (For the record, Trump uses the word "wicked" to describe Donny Deutsch David Gregory Lindsey Graham and Mitt Romney Marco Rubio Ted Cruz and Charles Krauthammer to name only a few.)
You see, if you simply present a claim, deserved or no, and badert, like Scott, that she's "rooted" in a belief – no matter what she believes! – it becomes true!
Charles Blow, always good laugh, acknowledged Sunday in his New York Times column that the question of journalist Sun was a "staged" for Trump. But Blow knew in his heart that it was a "montage" that "both parties wanted".
Blow explained, "A better journalist, if he wanted Trump to consider [Meghan’s 2016] 's comments, just read Meghan' s answer and ask for the president 's response." These are Blow's journalism lessons, which has proudly missed a face-to-face meeting with Trump in 2017.
And apart from journalism, stupidity is not limited to Blow.
ABC Analyst Matthew Dowd tweeted that Trump "used the mean word … in reference to her".
CBS News correspondent Bill Rehkopf tweeted, "He called him."
Washington Post columnist Karen Tumulty tweeted: "He actually calls it" naughty "in this audio.This is the exact word that he uses."
Politico's Ben White tweeted: "It's literally exactly what he says." I did not know that she was naughty. ""
Well, yes. It's "literally exactly" what Trump said the same way this morning, "literally exactly" said, "I'm going to kill you. I only wanted to say that I did not agree with his decision to withdraw my use of the word "pacifiers" from an article on Michael Avenatti
. Asset. They will lie about the fact that Trump calls immigrants "animals" (he was explicitly referring to MS-13 gang members). Trump will qualify European allies as enemies (it's Jeff Glor from CBS who used this word). And they will lie about it by making fun of a disabled journalist.
Meghan is not a victim and she was not attacked. She is a critic of the White House and, like all the media, helps her to disappear when she receives an answer.
[ad_2]
Source link
