The Undertaker seems to be much better than many new superstars [19659016] The episode this week had its property and evils and its ups and downs. What was important in this episode was that it provided the final implementation of the scenarios that will occupy a central place at the Super ShowDown event three nights later.
We had a good team game to get the night off to a good start. Kofi Kingston and Xavier Woods clashed with Sami Zayn and Kevin Owens. Apart from that, the WWE surprisingly gave us the number one contender at the Women's SmackDown Championship at the show when we least expected it.
The 24/7 Championship changed hands twice during the night, which allowed R-Truth to become a 4-time 24/7 Champion record.
With all this and more packed in just two hours, the WWE let us ask many questions at the end of the night.
In this article we will review the 3 biggest questions we have from this week's SmackDown episode.
# 3 Does a monster need to explain?
For the second time at SmackDown, Kayla Braxton has attempted to interview the man who destroys legends and mid-card superstars since WrestleMania 35a ended.
While Braxton was not very good at extracting the words from Lars' mouth, it was The Freak himself who interviewed the interview. stating that he hurt people because he had accepted the role that he had been given fr, as all the monsters feared him.
Well, we now know why Lars is destroying other superstars, but does it really matter to us? Did not we know why he had been introduced to the main list six months ago?
The WWE put a segment to explain the actions of a man who is just there to impose his dominance was a very bad idea, as he is still. to participate in a match and show his complete dominance. The interview and comments could have waited later.
Instead, WWE could have led Lars to destroy the Lumberjacks during the Lumberjack match and unwittingly play a role in R-Truth, which reclaimed its 24/7 championship. ] More content …
[ad_2]
Source link