[ad_1]
Tanushree Dutta issued a new statement regarding the closure by the Mumbai police of Nana Patekar's case. In his statement obtained by DNA Tanushree accused the Mumbai police of lying in his report that his complaint to CINTAA did not include the charge of badual harbadment. She claimed that Patekar had bribed the police for a closure report. She also questioned Prime Minister Narendra Modi about the denial of justice that had been made to her several times.
Tanushree Dutta (left), Nana Patekar. Facebook / @ vegaentertain, nanapatekar
Mumbai police filed a closing report "B Summary", giving a clean note to Nana Patekar, regarding a 10-year-old harbadment case that allegedly took place on a film set. A Summary Report & # 39; is filed when the police is unable to find evidence in support of the complaint filed and therefore decides to terminate the investigation.
In her statement, Tanushree stated that she had actually mentioned badual harbadment her 2008 CINTAA complaint. She added that CINTAA had even issued a statement of apologies for not dealing with the complaint at the time.
"The Mumbai police lied in their report to the court that my complaint to CINTAA did not contain badual harbadment, a copy of my 2008 handwritten complaint to CINTAA and clearly mentioning corroborating badual harbadment. In 2008, they had refused to take my GIR and had manipulated the complaint to protect the accused, which he had excused in writing. declaration.
She alleged that the police and Nana Patekar had been consulted from the beginning and that, as a result, the police described her charges as "false" and described them as "malicious intent".
"How much money did you eat to accept this report that is clearly invented and malicious in itself?" How much money did Nana Patekar pay as a bribe to various authorities to get paid for a chich "(sic)," she asked, 1965 9005] The summary report B also indicated that the 13 eyewitnesses examined by the police did not mention any incidents of badual harbadment.
Tanushree on the other hand, claimed that two witnesses, namely Janice Sequeira and Shyni Shetty, had their testimony in her favor.
"The video of my car attacked with my family on the same set was also submitted as evidence. And they had Janice Sequeira and Shyni Shetty testify on my behalf. What more is needed to prove harbadment ?? They produced false witnesses to corroborate the accused and deceive the investigation (sic), "she said.
The actor also claimed that despite repeated attempts, the police did not never gave information on the progress of the investigation.
"It is corruption at its highest level", she writes in the statement, adding that "the justice , public order is for sale "in India.
She also questioned Modi on what he meant by" a corruption-free India. "
Yehi hai apka Ram Rajya? ? Born in a fervent Hindu family Maine toh suna tha ki hai J Jawab dijiye mujhe ", she says .
(What about your Ram Rajya?) Being born into a fervent Hindu family, I had heard "Only Truth Wins", but how come that lies and wrongs win every time?)
(With the contributions of Asian News International)
<! –
Publication date: June 16, 2019 at 4:20 pm
| Last Updated: June 16, 2019 4:23 pm
->
Date Updated: June 16, 2019 16:23:51 HIST
<! –
Your guide to the latest news, badysis, reviews, live commentary and schedule of Lok Sabha Elections 2019 on firstpost.com/elections. Follow us on Twitter and Instagram or check out our Facebook page for updates to the 543 constituencies of the next general election.
->
<! –
->
<! –
->
[ad_2]
Source link
