[ad_1]
The Lion King is expected to come out next week. The film has garnered good reviews on social media. However, it has not made its debut on a good note on rotten tomatoes.
When the first reactions took place on the Internet, it seemed that The Lion King was going to receive excellent reviews. However, it seems that this is not the case. Jon Favreau's new presentation, titled The Lion King, is a new version of the 1994 animated film. Disney's new live movie features Donald Glover as Simba, Beyonce as Nala, Seth Rogen as Pumbaa and Billy Eichner as Timon. The trailers look promising and the hype around the film is also good. Earlier this week, the film was shown in Hollywood and it was hailed for its visual element and the restoration of the nostalgia quotient.
Although our hopes are great, the first evaluation of Rotten Tomatoes gives a frightening picture. The Disney movie debuted on the platform with 58%. These ratings are from a total of 82 badessments to date. However, this rating will change depending on the number of reviews. This is Disney's third live action movie released this year and he has not achieved Rotten's score in Rotten Tomatoes. Dumbo is present on the site with 46% of the votes while Aladdin got 57%. The Lion King could change the game as more and more critics arrive.
At the same time, recently revealed critics consider the Lion King to be "easily the best of Disney's remakes". Another critic also mentioned, "Whatever your feelings about Disney's remakes, this one will amaze you." Incidentally, a reviewer also pointed out, "It's a good remake of Disney, but was it necessary? Maybe not, but it's nice." Another reviewer also said, "Did we need a live version of The Lion King? Maybe not … but this version is beautifully designed by Jon Favreau … gives me all the feeling of being back on Pride Rock.
Do you plan to watch The Lion King? Let us know your thoughts in the comments below.
ALSO READ: The new promo of King Lion: the love interest of Simmba, Nala, to help him regain the throne
[ad_2]
Source link
