[ad_1]
Akshay Kumar seems annoyed. In a statement released Friday by the actor and the apolitical interviewer, he complained about the "unnecessary controversy" over the issue of his citizenship. It turns out that Kumar is Canadian.
For a public figure whose mark has strongly relied on his powerful love for India in recent years – 11 "nationalist" films since 2014, according to one indictment chief, the confirmation that it is not, in fact, only Indian reaffirms the feeling that all the fist beats have more commercial intentions than anything else.
This also corresponds to the image of a certain type of supporter of the ruling party, the Bharatiya Janata: He constantly gives lectures to anyone who opposes what it means to be truly Indian, even if they live abroad and have a different nationality. The NRI WhatsApp Uncle, if you want.
But Kumar's statement reveals something a little deeper.
"I really do not understand the unjustified interest and negativity of my citizenship. I have never hidden nor denied my Canadian pbadport … For all these years, I have never needed to prove my love for India to anyone, but I find it disappointing that my question of citizenship is constantly drawn into unnecessary controversy. this is personal, legal, apolitical and of no consequence to others.
Regardless of the fact that he has already been untruthful about his citizenship, insisting that his Canadian citizenship is "honorary" as an honorary doctorate. (This is not the case)
The point is as follows: "I have never needed to prove my love for India to anyone." The fact is that Kumar, by the mere proximity, if not otherwise, is allied to the political forces of the country that actually demand this evidence, not Canadian actors who make patriotic films, but millions of people who live in the country.
The overall political project of the BJP is based on the idea that anyone who disapproves of Rashtirya Swayamsevak Sangh's vision of the country is anti-national and does not deserve to live in India. Minorities in the country, especially Muslims, feel this more strongly, but have recently been extended to anyone with the temerity to question the BJP.
This is not an undeclared dog whistle. The BJP literally promises to institute a national registry of citizens for the whole country. Such an effort is aimed at creating a climate in which the BJP and its supporters can challenge the citizenship of anybody in the country, thereby challenging their very right to live in the country.
Even without such legislation, this project to change what it means to be Indian is already in effect.
Listening closely
This is the message sent when the prime minister and the president of the BJP imply that a constituency parliamentarian where Hindus are not totally dominant is not, at Some ways, really Indian This is the message sent when a renowned TV reporter has to invoke the criminal record of his father, an army man, just so he can ask a question to a minister.
This is the message sent when the BJP introduces a bill that would give citizenship to refugees of all religions in neighboring countries, with the exception of Muslims. This is the message sent while the mere fact of being Muslim could be a sufficient provocation to be beaten and lynched by a mob.
The BJP strives to create a climate in which blind loyalty to Modi and the saffron party is an offense, which will bring out the crowds, online or offline. He wants to pbad a law that will literally allow the government to badess the right of everyone to call themselves an Indian, an effort that will inevitably go against the poor and the vulnerable.
Despite his Canadian citizenship, Akshay Kumar's love for India should not be questioned. But millions of Indian citizens do not have the easy choice of playing in nationalist films to badert their patriotism.
Kumar finds it disappointing that his citizenship and love for the country is at the root of many controversies. In addition to discussing mangos and the daily routine, he may have asked Narendra Modi, during their recent televised discussion, why he wants to extend this "unnecessary controversy" to millions of citizens across the country?
[ad_2]
Source link
