[ad_1]
Rahman recently won the Oscar for best musical direction for Slumdog Millionaire, directed by Danny Boyle. The musical genius celebrated this occasion with an event held Monday in Dharavi, the largest shantytown in the world, in Mumbai. And his daughter Khatija went on stage to commemorate him. She did not realize that simply supporting her father would lead her and the musician into an anti-hate campaign.
All she had to do, was to wear a burqa. As soon as the photos of the concert were broadcast on social media, Rahman was targeted by so-called advocates of freedom of choice and expression. They said it was cruel of her to impose her religious beliefs on her daughter, that it was unfair of her to "force" her to wear a burqa.
<! –
->
People also called Rahman for alleged double standard. "Sir, I thought your religion was music, I was wrong," a Twitter user wrote to Rahman.
Rahman and Khatija both reacted strongly to hatred. Rahman posted a picture of his daughters Kahtija and Rahima with his wife Saira Bano. The three wear different clothes and pose with Nita Ambani. The picture was displayed with the hashtag #FreedomTochoose.
The precious ladies of my family Khatija, Raheema and Sairaa with NitaAmbaniji #freedomtochoose . Pic.twitter.com/H2DZePYOta
– ARRah) On February 6, 2019
Khatija also embarked on social media to defend his father's position. She claimed that her religious choices were hers and that what she was wearing was also her decision and not that of her father. "There were some comments that said my father had imposed this outfit and that he had double standards.I would like to say that the clothing that I wear or the choices I make in my life do have nothing to do with my parents, "Khatija wrote in a Facebook message.
"The veil has been my personal choice with complete acceptance and honor, I am a mature, healthy adult who knows how to make my choices in life, and every human being has the choice to wear or do what he / she she wants and that's what I did, "she wrote. She concluded by asking people not to judge situations immediately before being aware of all facets.
The irony is that women continue to be told what they may or may not wear, even if it is for their own liberation and empowerment or in the name of liberal secularism . This incident reminds me of the time when France banned burkini in the name of maintaining secularism. What followed was the shameful harbadment of a number of Muslim women, including young and old, who were asked to undress on the public beaches as they wore a burkini. .
The argument is simple, really. An article or merchandise is oppressive as long as it is forced on a person without his consent. Even if we do not believe in religion, we must allow people, including women, to choose their own path and their own faith. We do not call a Muslim man wearing a cap and a beard oppressed by Islam, is not it? We call him a person who chooses to observe and express his faith. The same goes for Sikh men who choose to keep their turban. We do not question the law.
Why do we have to question women when they choose to follow their religion? And the fact that people on social networks immediately began to blame AR Rahman for choosing his daughter's clothes also shows how much society, to which society belongs, is perceived by women. The father and the daughter had to go out and clarify to the whole world an intimate detail of their personal life that no one needed to know at all!
How does one say to a Muslim woman that her burqa is the result of a forced religion, while the same goes for " ghunghat & # 39; ; clothed bahus & # 39; in many parts of North India do not? AR Rahman and his daughter betray only opportunism in a country where religious hatred is the main fodder that fuels political and social discourse. And using distorted versions of feminism to justify hatred, especially Islamophobia, is the new trick of neoliberal jingoists. How do you talk about empowering women by releasing them from so-called "restrictive" Islamophobic clothing, ask yourself? Some examples of comments posted on Rahman's tweet.
1) Khatija JI would have had trouble enjoying dinner. 2) khatija JI could have sent anybody in his place, no one would have recognized him. – mahabharath (@ mahabharath4) 6 February 2019
Rehmaan sir, I am a big fan of your song, but I am disappointed in your bcaz, but I am disappointed in your religion, but he has hidden his program for the time being. Islam, great sir, we, Indian, do not understand people, even that naseer lage raho miya – maddy501 (@ madddy501) on February 7, 2019
Rahman's family with his domestic penguin
– Raghav Pandey (@rghvpandey) February 7, 2019
I rest my case.
I know what is happening now. The biggest news on CNN-News18, your favorite news channel on English TV. Keep watching CNN-News18 at only 50 Paise per month. Contact your cable / DTH operator now!
* A rental / capacity fee of Rs.130 / – charged by the cable / DTH operator can be applied. ** GST extra.
[ad_2]
Source link
