[ad_1]
But while most people were wondering if their favorite Avenger would survive and share other theories about the end of the saga on the Internet, Thanos and his ploy of "wielding a switch to kill half of humanity "have always been a much more intriguing aspect of the arc, making Thanos a complex character with many shades of reasoning and logic, and not just your fundamental murderer mentally unbalanced.
Ever since Marvel Cinematic Universe (MCU) megalomaniac super-titan appeared on screen in Avengers: Infinity Wars, many MCU fans have loved to hate him, making him a real punch bag for members. The so-called "dark story" of the previous film, in which Thanos manages to erase half of humanity at random, in a snap of fingers, thanks to the Infinity glove in gold stitched stones, which frightened of many series & # 39; Fans who, despite understanding and appreciation of villains in conflict with stories, do not like the idea of losing their favorite Avengers.
<! –
->
However, it is this sacrifice itself that Thanos seeks to obtain from the world. The mbadacre is lifted almost directly from Jim Starlin's The Infinity Gauntlet comic in 1991.
However, there are some differences between the patterns of the big screen Thanos and Mad Titan comicverse. For example, in comics, Thanos ends half of her life to impress Mistress Death, a girl that Thanos knew as a child and is now the counterpart of the Grim Reaper's MCU comics.
In Josh Brolin's film Thanos, however, does not mention Mistress Death (she was also not mentioned in the narrative arc). He mentions, however, "overpopulation" as the cause of the pogrom.
Fans have formulated many theories about why Thanos did what he did. Some are linked to his tragic story on his home planet, Titan. He saw Titan being destroyed and continue to be haunted by the mbadacre, a slaughter that could only be avenged by killing half of the creatures in the universe.
"Overpopulation" is truly the most serious disease in the world, sparking conflict, covetousness, inequitable distribution of resources, disease and social oppression through a hierarchical control of resources. In this sense, Thanos can be considered as an anti-hero, alienated by war and destruction, but to arrive at the solution that humanity (and all other creatures) are themselves the agents of the destruction of the universe. He kills half of his life to SAVE the rest.
While it was convenient for filmmakers to avoid the death tangent of the mistress, the link with overpopulation raises many questions.
IS Thanos trying to protect the rest of the world by killing half of the existing creatures? Such a thing is possible? Many researchers claim that mbadive deaths such as those caused by pandemics such as the Great Plague and Great Britain Famine of the 1300s, which wiped out nearly half of the island's population, paved the way for the industrial revolution and the British agricultural boom.
At the end of the medieval era, overcrowding was one of the most important socio-economic problems for the population. The plague, which slaughtered a large part of the population, was tragic, but also brought the British population back to a size that could be easily satiated and, in turn, controlled.
Another interesting similarity between the Thanos mbadacre and the Great Plague is its clbadless appearance. The plague did not spare peasants and elites, like Thanos, which resulted in a sort of reorganization of social structures in the 12th century in Britain.
The idea of killing half of the existence to save the rest of the world and ensure the livelihood of Similarly, reducing the number of stakeholders is not far from Thanos. Before Thanos, many evil anti-heroes had imagined a world with a population half as magic. In his 2013 inferno thriller Inferno, writer Dan Borwn wrote that the main villain was a philosophical man who believed that systematic purge was the only way forward for the survival of mankind.
Like Thanos, Dan Brown's villain does not want to choose or choose, he does not want to kill the rich and save the poor or vice versa. Like Thanos, he wants an impartial and practical cleansing of the earth scum, in this case humans.
A more recent reference to popular culture to purge populations for global "well-being" was seen in an episode of the popular animated show called Rick and Morty . The episode entitled "Who's Purging Now" describes a society that was the most peaceful of the universe, except the "purge" days chosen, where all the inhabitants indulged in pogrom and violence . The idea was that by participating in the purge, people could work on a petty badault that makes them fall from day to day and become subject to a cathartic, even temporary release. And fewer mouths to feed should result in a surplus of resources!
Mbadacre innocent people, however, it's never the solution to ending an inequality. And the public would do well to remember that they are fictional characters that do not exist and that do not wield power in the real world that exists without Nick Fury and his band of vigilantes. half of the world would never solve the problems, as the remaining populations would continue to exploit the inequalities and create new ones to cope with the changing social order, an issue that the world is facing. unnoticed ecologist of Thanos fa It should be taken into account (although in Infinity Wars it is not clear whether Thanos has eliminated half of the human beings or ALL existing creatures, in which case the impact would be greater, more powerful and more durable.)
Anti-heroes like Thanos raise an important point – does the planet have the capacity to accommodate the growing number of human populations in the world? Does it have enough resources to feed, clothe and shelter billions of people? Can it continue to bear the burden of exploitation suffered daily by more than 7.3 billion humans?
If a real Thanos cut half of humanity, the world's population would fall to 3.8 billion. Humans had already reached this figure in 1970 and decimation would only bring humanity back a few decades in numbers. Imagine what the world could do with a population halved and resources doubled with the current level of human know-how and expertise? Fauna and flora would flourish, poverty could be eradicated, world food security would cease to be a chimera and even inequalities would be banned. However, at current birth rates around the world, it would only take a few decades for humans to bring the population back to a "normal" one.
Thanos could be killed in Avengers: End of the match, he could well realize his "mistake". Or maybe he would continue to believe in his imperfect logic. But the argument raised by Thanos can not be considered a crazy psychosis. The planet is on the verge of collapse due to the widespread exploitation and over-exploitation of resources by humans. If we do not find the solution to contain the population, it could very well be an "endgame". for humans on the planet Earth.
[ad_2]
Source link
