[ad_1]
The original filmmakers of Avengers: Endgame ended up in a rather tight narrative corner with the conclusion of the film's predecessor, Avengers: Infinity War. After all, in Infinity War, the villain won – the Mad Titan Thanos grabbed all the Infinity Stones and used them to erase half of the universe's life, including half of the beloved heroes of the MCU (some of whom had movies at the time). Everyone has badumed that the heroes of the film world Marvel would try to cancel the actions of Thanos. The question was how could they handle this?
The answer, as we know it now, is the journey back in time. But time travel is confusing in movies (not to mention theoretical physics) the best days, when you do not face the magic of space that can rewrite the rules of reality. In fact, it's so confusing that it seems that filmmakers and screenwriters of Infinity War and Endgame have different (and mutually exclusive) ideas about how it works. (To better understand what's going on in the film, take a look at this boogaloo of the distribution of time travel in Endgame.)
In their interview with Entertainment Weekly, filmmakers Joe and Anthony Russo described the travel back in time to Endgame as creating alternative deadlines – basically, every time. the characters return to the past, the changes they bring create new complete worlds with new events, the original universe remaining intact and unchanged. This is how the Avengers can return to the New York battle, for example, and accidentally release Loki. This creates a new timeline where Loki did not return to Asgard, as he did in the original MCU timeline (represented in Thor: The Dark World). The timeline was that Loki is loose with the Tesseract in 2012 is his own separate universe, and the Avengers are able to travel in one way or another between them. This more or less corresponds to the way Bruce Banner explains the trip back in time in the film itself, so it's good so far.
The Russo use this model of time travel to explain the end of Captain America, one of the most confusing and controversial events of the film. . At the end of the film, Cape goes back in time to bring back the Infinity Stones where the Avengers found them, but he stays in the past to spend his life with Peggy Carter, the woman that Cap described as being the only one. love of his life.
It seems that the machine to explore the film is not about bringing people back to the past, but rather to help them find their original universe, the one we have observed from the beginning. But this raises the question: if Cape Town was in another scenario, how could he return to the original schedule to give Sam Wilson his shield at the end of the movie? The Russo have covered this issue in their interview with the GE, without giving a definitive answer:
"If Cape Town were to return to the past and live there, it would create a ramified reality, so the question is how does it return to the past, this reality to give the shield? "Joe Russo asked with a smile. "An interesting question, no? Maybe there's a story in there. There are a lot of layers in this movie and we spent three years thinking about it, so it's fun to have. Talk about it and hope to fill the holes so that people understand what we're thinking. "
We also know that Peggy was married and had children while Steve was supposed to be frozen in a glacier, the presence of Cape in his life would not fundamentally change these events?
The Russo are in agreement that it's true, but the Peggy Cape ends up being in another timeline, so you'll solve the questions Ethics raised by fans about Cape Town, destroying Peggy's family for her own happiness.
"If you come back to this delay, between the moment Steve entered the ice [in Captain America: The First Avenger] and yet before Peggy met her husband, Peggy was available," said Anthony Russo in another interview, this time with The Hollywood Reporter. As for Peggy's family, "They exist in a different calendar," said the administrators. So Cap did not erase his family in the original timeline, but simply in the new, which is perhaps better, because technically they still exist somewhere?
Be that as it may, the way in which the Russians explain the time travel is the one we interpreted in Endgame. also (and really, that's the only way it makes sense). But Stephen McFeely and Christopher Markus, the writers of the film, have a totally different vision. The couple gave an interview to Fandango, in which they explained that the time travel of the film was completely different. Instead of creating new deadlines and other realities created by each of the changes the Avengers make when traveling over time, the editors said that only the removal of the Infinity Stones creates branches – which is similar (and just as confusing) as the former Bruce Banner was told during the movie.
"We are not time travel experts, but the former said that when you remove an infinite stone from a timeline, it creates a new timeline, so Steve goes back. no new timeline, "said Markus. "So, I reject the theory of" Steve is in an alternative reality. "I believe there is simply a period of world history going from 1948 to the present day when there are two Steve Rogers. And anyway, for a large part of it, it's like they met. "
So, Markus and McFeely say that Cape might be in the past, live his life and that his presence would not change the schedule – and therefore, he could simply stand in 2023 to give Sam the shield. That does not seem to take into account problems such as Loki escaping with Tesseract or Cap pretending to be an agent HYDRA, but it seems that the movie tries to explain this with the conversation with the Ancients: essentially, the Infinity Stones are magical, and as they create "the flow of time", it is impossible for changes to delve into the timeline. Or something.
Lost? Yes, U.S. too. Maybe the bottom line is that time travel is a beast for the very talented authors and directors in Hollywood, and he tries to add it to something so huge and manageable that the MCU was even harder. But if time travel can add an element of strange logic to Endgame, it seems that the biggest MCU will have to face something different, as we saw in the last trailer of Spider-Man: Far From Home. This is the idea of several parallel universes, directly from Marvel Comics (not to mention last year's Spider-Man: Towards the Spider-Verse). Hope this is not too confusing.
Source link
