[ad_1]
"Are you ostriches", asked Friday the censorship board for refusing to issue a universal certificate (U) to a children's film and claimed that the commission "will not decide what We wish to see and see "
In well-phrased observations, SC Dharmadhikari and Gautam Patel, divisional judges, also stated that it may be necessary to redefine the role of the Central Film Certification Board ( CBFC), because the latter "one with a minimum of intelligence to decide for everyone".
The court heard a petition filed by the Children's Film Society (SFC) of India, asking the court of the CBFC to order its court to plead in favor of film "Chidiakhana".
In January, the jury issued a universal / adult certificate (U / A) for the film, due to an offensive word and a particular scene in it.
intended for children and must be screened at school ls.
She said she was ready to remove both objections.
The court stated that the CBFC, in requesting that such scenes be deleted in the films, claimed that these problems did not exist.
"Are you (CBFC) ostriches? Put your head in the sand and pretend that something did not exist," Judge Patel said.
The CBFC told the court on Friday that it had certain conditions and that if they are met, the film will receive the "U / A" rating.
Irritated, the Supreme Court asked how the jury could indicate that it would issue the certificate "U / A", whether the scene and the offensive word were deleted or not.
"We are really wondering if the CBFC leaders have children of their own.You (CBFC) are a certification office and not a censorship office.You will not decide what you want to watch and see," said Judge Patel.
"No one has given you (CBFC) the intellectual morality and authority to decide what you want to see and see," he added.
The court added that the world was changing, as was the art of telling stories.
"Looks like we may have to completely redefine your role (CBFC) You (CBFC) are coming to an opinion that the whole population is childish and foolish and you are the only one who can decide everyone, Judge Patel said.
The court said that a children's film shows or talks about issues such as racism, discrimination, child labor and drug abuse, it is better using movies to explain these questions to children
"If not, how do you show and explain these questions to a child? Is it not better to show such films to the child and explain that this is happening and that it is wrong, "said Judge Patel.
The court ordered the CBFC Regional Officer to file an affidavit detailing and clarifying board policy while certifying children's films.
On August 5, she filed the motion for a new hearing.
According to the petition, the CBFC had asked to silence an abusive word and to suppress a scene that it considered offensive. [19659002] The movie "Chidiakhana" tells the story of a boy from Bihar, who is moving to Mumbai to pursue his dream of playing football.
ALSO READ | 83: Ranveer Singh will live with Kapil Dev in Delhi for 10 days
WATCH OUT | Ranveer Singh makes Delhi Gully Boy dance at the India Today Conclave 2019
[ad_2]
Source link
