[ad_1]
Can a brown person be accused of "browning"? Apparently yes.
Since the movie trailer Super 30 social media jostle unanimous criticism against Hrithik Roshan who equates deglamoration to a darker skin. We always knew that Hrithik was terribly fair and had always used tanning over the years; it's nothing new and nobody cares.
Hrithik Roshan in Super 30. Screengrab of Youtube. ” width=”825″ height=”464″/>
19659005] Three years ago, when Alia Bhatt swept all the awards for "Best Actress" for her role in Udta Punjab no one blinked. At that time, there was little or no indignation about it, so why now? Could this have anything to do with the fact that this trailer fell as a result of a mbadive national scandal around the deeply rooted caste politics in Indian educational institutions? The debate around a much larger problem has led to something that might seem trivial to most people, but the fact is that our film industry has a choice if it is to break or perpetuate stereotypes, and they clearly choose the latter; because it is practical.
While the term browning (the darkening of the skin color by artists other than brown to represent a brown) was discovered by many people in India for the first time this week, this practice has existed for decades . Whether it's Peter Sellers as Hrundi Bakshi in The Party (1968) or Jake Gyllenhall in The Price of Persia (2010), Hollywood is infamous for his choices of casting (most recently Scarlett Johansson played a character of Asian origin in The Ghost of the Shell (19459010), which provoked a brutal reaction). However, the inclusion debate has dramatically reduced the number of people over the past decade.
In India, however, we are not even close to understanding why this is a problem. The most common reaction among people is: "So what?"
To understand why our brand of browning is as problematic as the West, if not more, we must look at the characters for which it has been conceived. first place. In Doosri Sita (1974), Jaya Bachchan wore a makeup that made her much darker to interpret such an ugly character that no one would like. Zeenat Aman played the role of domestic worker in Pyaas (1982). And who could ever forget Junior Mehmood singing " Hum Kaale Hai Toh Kya Hua … " in Brahmachaari (1968), with the worst case of dark makeup ever made. This has been going on for years and continues to this day, with Ranveer Singh who looks darkly playing the role of a slum in Gully Boy .
You see a common thread in all these roles? An "ugly" girl, a maid, a homeless orphan, a slum dweller. For the privileged people who make films, these roles represent "the others". They are not their pawns, but part of the society that is supposed to be submitted to them.
(L) Hrithik Roshan; (R) Anand Kumar, on which the film is based.
Indian racism is rooted in its history and nothing has really changed today. If you live in denial, simply get a copy of today's marriage clbadifieds. Everybody always wants a fair bahu because it will raise fair sons who will grow up and become "just and charming" supremacists and give back to India a new place (or something similar) . Linking one's social clbad or wealth to the color of one's skin is, of course, much more Indian. In North India, a black person is perceived to be either poor, or a lower clbad, or 'Madrasi'. And a not insignificant majority of those occupying positions of power in Bollywood are North Indians.
The role of Hrithik in Super 30 is based on the inspiring story of Anand Kumar, an educator in Bihari. He traces his career, from tutoring to rich children to the opening of his own place, through teaching to disadvantaged children. Kumar was an ordinary man who did heroic things and brought about social change. So, what was the filmmaker's taking? "Hrithik is just too good to be credible in this role, let's make it darker." We will not make a darker actor because who will watch the movie, and we can not have an honest guy who plays the role of a poor man because apparently this is not realistic
There is a world that desperately fights these everyday stereotypes and seeks to get people to look beyond the color of their skin. has always played a role in social change and, in the last century, the audiovisual medium has had the greatest influence on social behavior.As a filmmaker, if authenticity represents a "character of life "Really" first, then do the casting authentically and maybe get an actor who reasonably looks at the role.Thus, maybe try to look beyond the color of the skin.If the trade interests you (nobody do not judge you), you must believe that the star power of the chosen actor is enough to embody a character without stumbling on the potholes of negative stereotypes; otherwise, you will be called.
<! –
Date of publication: June 06, 2019 from 14:09
| Last Updated: June 06, 2019 14:09
->
Date Updated: June 06, 2019 14:09:07 IST
Your guide to the latest election news, reviews, comments, live updates and calendar of Lok Sabha Elections 2019 on firstpost.com/elections. Follow us on Twitter and Instagram or check our Facebook page for updates to the 543 constituencies of the next general election.
<! –
->
<! –
->
[ad_2]
Source link
