[ad_1]
<div _ngcontent-c14 = "" innerhtml = "
Last night was the finale of the series of five HBO shows and Sky Chernobyl seems destined not only to sweep away certain categories of Emmys later this year, but it seems obvious that the series has carved itself a place of choice in the history of television.
The ratings in the series do not are not off the charts, but with few recognizable faces and such a haunting and accurate subject, this is not a surprise.The fact that it's going as well, say, the HBO miniseries of 39 Amy Adam Sharp Objects is somehow impressive 19659005] But after episode five, no fact has changed since I talked about that a few weeks earlier .The viewers ranked Chernobyl as the number one series history's reviews, according to over a hundred thousand votes on IMDB.
The top ten list did not change from sin two weeks ago, nor after last night's finale, which, I think, suits everyone, was terrific. But now, Chernobyl has more than doubled his number of votes before and keeps exactly the same score.
- Chernobyl (9,7 – 111,000 votes)
- Planet Earth II (9.5 – 71,000 votes)
- Band of Brothers (9.5 – 317,000 votes)
- The planet Earth (9.4 – 147.000 voice)
- Breaking the bad (9.4 – 1 200 000 votes)
- The game of Thrones (9.4, 1,500,000) votes)
- Our planet (9,4 – 10,000 votes)
- The wire of iron (9,3 – 244,000 votes)
- The cosmos (9,3 – 95,000 votes)
- The blue planet (9,3 – 19,000 votes)
As for critical opinion? In this country of television, it is a little more difficult to quantify. Unlike movies, Rotten tomatoes are not as useful for television because only the seasons are marked and the number of reviews is reduced. Even one can drop the averages abruptly. And many opinions are based only on the first episode or the first two episodes, not on the entire series. Chernobyl has a 94% score with only three rotten critics of The Week, Guardian and The New York Times, but two of them were written a month ago. Rotten tomatoes have too many seasons 100% revised to be able to count. At present, this includes the former mad girlfriend, Tuca and Bertie, Brooklyn 99, Fleabag, Better Things and Barry and these are just ongoing shows of diffusion. There is therefore no real way to have a good "list" as in the case of voting by the IMDB
The same goes for Metacritic where Chernobyl has an 83, but the best seasons of all time series are just strange, as the season 4 of Rectify with a 99, Homeland Season 2 with [19969014] The Larry Sanders Show in the 90s, three of the four best-ever seasons of all time. This does not seem … the most accurate, according to your tastes. & nbsp;
The BDIM vote also has its own flaws, of course, but I think it is the largest barometer that can be verified of the general public enthusiasm for a series, and it does not There is no equivalent for critics that offers as much useful information. , since critics are critical piecemeal and are often not updated once the seasons have been watched.
I do not know if Chernobyl will remain forever at the forefront of the BDIM, but this is not a series just good for his filming, writing and powerful performances. It also seemed relevant, a cautionary tale not about the dangers of nuclear energy, but about the importance of truth and the cost of lies, which is somehow a timeless message, and many relate to our current climate often neglect change science.
"Why worry about something that is not going to happen?"
"We should put it on our money."
Look Chernobyl and watch a little but important part of Television History.
Follow me & nbsp; on Twitter & nbsp; Facebook & nbsp; and & nbsp; Instagram . & Nbsp; Read my new biography detective novel & nbsp; Herokiller now available in print and online. I also wrote & nbsp; The trilogy born of the earth .
">
Last night it was the finale of the fifth part of HBO and Sky that seems destined not only to sweep certain categories Emmys later this year, but it seems obvious that the series has carved a place of choice in the history of television.
There is nothing surprising in the charts, but with few faces recognizable and a subject as captivating and precise, it is not a big surprise.The fact that it happens as well as, say, the small series of Amam Adam Sharp Objects HBO C & # 39; is quite impressive.
But after episode 5, the observation has not changed since I spoke about it a few weeks ago: viewers ranked Chernobyl as the number one television series of history, according to more than one hundred thousand votes on IMDB.
The list of The first ten have not been nged for two weeks, nor after last night's finale, which everyone can agree on, it was great. But now, Chernobyl has more than doubled his number of votes before and keeps exactly the same score.
- Chernobyl (9,7 – 111,000 votes)
- Planet Earth II (9,5 – 71,000 votes)
- The Band of Brothers (9,5 – 317,000 votes)
- The Planet Earth (9.4 – 147 000 votes)
- Breaking Bad (9.4 – 1 200 000 votes)
- Game of Thrones (9.4, 1 500 000 votes)
- Our Planet (9,4 – 10,000 votes)
- The Wire (9,3 – 244,000 votes)
- Cosmos (9,3 – 95,000 votes)
- Blue Planet (9,3 – 19,000 votes)
which concerns the critical opinion? In this country of television, it is a little more difficult to quantify. Unlike movies, Rotten Tomatoes is not as useful for television because only the seasons are marked and the number of critics is reduced. Even one can drop the averages abruptly. And many opinions are based only on the first episode or the first two episodes, not on the entire series. Chernobyl has a 94% score with only three rotten critics of The Week, Guardian and The New York Times, but two of them were written a month ago. Rotten tomatoes have too many seasons 100% revised to be able to count. At present, this includes the former mad girlfriend, Tuca and Bertie, Brooklyn 99, Fleabag, Better Things and Barry and these are just ongoing shows of diffusion. There is therefore no real way to have a good "list" as in the case of voting by the IMDB
The same goes for Metacritic, where Chernobyl ] has an 83, but the best show seasons of all time are just strange, as the season 4 of Rectify with a 99, Homeland season 2 with a 96 and three seasons of Larry Sanders' show in the 90 best years, including three of the four best-ever seasons of all time. This does not seem … the most accurate, according to your tastes.
The BDIM vote also has its own flaws, of course, but I think it's the most complete barometer that can be verified of the public's enthusiasm for a series, and that it There is no equivalent for critics that provides much useful information, given how the shows are critical piecemeal and often not updated after watching the full seasons.
I do not know if Chernobyl will forever be at the forefront of the BDIM, but it's a show that was not just good because of its filming, its writing and its powerful performances. It also seemed relevant, a cautionary tale not about the dangers of nuclear energy, but about the importance of truth and the cost of lies, which is somehow a timeless message, and many relate to our current climate often neglect change science.
"Why worry about something that is not going to happen?"
"We should put it on our money."
Look Chernobyl and watch a little but important part of Television History.
Follow Me on Twitter on Facebook and on Instagram . Read my new science fiction thriller novel Herokiller now available in print and online. I also wrote The trilogy born of the earth .