Criticism of the film Thackeray: The film of Nawazuddin Siddiqui is not a whitewash, it is an admission. 1 star | Bollywood



[ad_1]

Thackeray
Director – Abhijit Panse
Cast – Nawazuddin Siddiqui, Amrita Rao
Rating – 1/5

A strong leader for a film, no matter the line that he takes. In the Thackeray affair, written and conducted by MNS leader Abhijit Panse, and produced by San Shiv Sena MP, Sanjay Raut, editor-in-chief of the party's periodical, Saamna, there was no doubt about his allegiance . I was waiting for a film echoing extremism and justifying the actions of the late Balasaheb Thackeray. I was waiting for scenes describing the politician as a warm and incomprehensible figure, and a film that essentially turns him into a hero. This is not this movie.

Shockingly, Thackeray savored the most controversial aspects of the Thackeray legend. It is a film where the main man is portrayed as a proud bigot, plays a hate speech, compares himself to Adolf Hitler and gives orders for the erasure of mosques and the badbadination of communists. His belief in preferential treatment for Maharashtrians in Maharashtra does not work as an excuse, not for all that ugly. This is not a whitewash, it's an admission.

Watch Thackeray's trailer here

This is also a film made with varnish – very contrasted black and white cinematography from Sudeep Chatterjee is quite striking – it recalls Ram Gopal Varma's older, finer work. Highlighting the rise of a mere draftsman for one of the country's most powerful political figures, Thackeray even feels like a prelude to Varma's Sarkar film, a hit that pays a servile tribute to the politician. Sarkar, however, had introduced the chief as a man of nobility, while Thackeray presented him – with exultation – as a tyrant. Do you see how much power he exercises? Do you see how it threatens politicians or reduces ruined places of worship? Do you see how he gets a cricket ground unearthed? It's our Tiger.

This is perhaps why the filmmakers entrust Nawazuddin Siddiqui with the lead role, a man known for his gangsters and psychopaths. Siddiqui visibly admires Thackeray's growing perversity, playing it with the irreplaceable bliss of a villain of a 90s movie. Of course, he wears thick black glbades and sometimes gets good manners, but despite speaking behind a big nose (apparently false), he does not even try to speak with Thackeray's distinctive tones. It looks like Nawaz, as we already know, as Ganesh Gaitonde or Faizal or Raman Raghav, someone increasingly intoxicated with power and eager to kill anyone who annoys him.

Nawazuddin Siddiqui as Balaseaheb Thackeray.

The politics of Siddiqui's casting in this part is messy. It is disheartening to see this Muslim actor talking about Hindu supremacy or celebrating the destruction of a mosque, hearing him engage in a full hate speech without leaving room for doubt. The film begins with the audience room that Thackeray, adjusting his saffron shawl and multiple rosaries, seems to explain his behavior, but as the film unfolds, the character proudly admires all his extremism. He literally speaks of himself as a second coming Adolf Hitler, probably early, then later defiantly, proclaiming himself Hitler for Maharashtra, which will soon be for the nation.

Read also: Review of the film Manto: Nawazuddin Siddiqui pours a glbad of Manto

As a film, the acting is decent, the look-alikes are generally good (the man who plays Thackeray's father Keshav, is a perfect caster) and he seems lively and well produced, with the majority of the film shot intelligently in black and white to portray another time. Despite careful production and effective performance, the film looks long, mainly because it refuses to believe that its protagonist has flaws.

Thackeray is a work of propaganda as much as pride.

This is an unconscious film or a blatant self-awareness, of a work that does not fall under propaganda as much as pride. celebrate a legacy of violence. At the beginning of a scene, the chef discusses the idea that adulthood is measured by the width of a man 's chest. Later, the film goes from black and white to color with a blooming orange blossom, a plan that makes a cruel and unequivocal mockery of the end of the film. Schindler's list. Thackeray is an alarming film, which serves only as a cautionary tale about the gravity of hate speech. Saying revolting things does not make a revolutionary.

(The opinions expressed in this article are the personal opinions of the author.They do not reflect the views of Hindustan Times.)

Follow @htshowbiz for more [19659018]. 19659005] First published: January 25, 2019 18:01 IST

[ad_2]
Source link